Pantagraph.com Weather forecast, local radar and more
Viewpoint: Additional CommentarySunday, October 15, 2006 12:02 AM CDT
Organic farming more dangerous to consumers
Advertisement

It's a bad moment for believers in the mystical wonders of organic and natural foods.

Deadly E. coli bacteria, lurking in spinach from one of the biggest organic farms in America, has resulted in at least three deaths. In all, the contaminated spinach sickened nearly 200, in at least 26 states and Canada.

Meanwhile, several California kids are on kidney dialysis with permanent organ damage from the same virulent strain of E. coli 0157: H7 after consuming raw, un-pasteurized milk or colostrum from the Organic Pastures Dairy of Fresno.

Tragically, the victims were all seeking greater food safety and the promised health benefits of vegetables and milk produced the "old-fashioned way."

Earthbound Farms, which grew the contaminated spinach, is being sued by a shocked family of organic believers in Ohio. Three family members were sickened, and one daughter has permanent kidney damage.

Earthbound Farms advertises that it sells "Food for Life," and says "It's just plain healthy to include lots of organic vegetables in your diet."

That certainly rings hollow today.

Now the farm's parent company has recalled huge batches of spinach sold all over the country under a variety of labels. "We will do whatever is necessary to help protect the health and safety of the consumers," said an Earthbound spokesperson.

Does that mean Earthbound will stop fertilizing its leafy vegetables with cow manure?

Most conventional farmers fertilize their food crops with "chemical" fertilizer, and put their livestock manure on feed crops like corn.

Organic farmers reject chemical fertilizer.

Instead, they compost raw cattle manure for some weeks, hoping that will kill any dangerous organisms that could contaminate the food. Sometimes it doesn't.

In the old days, when organic produce came from a few little farms, an occasional sick customer was no big deal. Often, the victim refused to believe organic food could cause the illness.

But so many people now believe the organic hype that organic farms have gotten big and corporate and the manure-related consumer epidemics make national news.

Organic Pastures ironically boasts that raw dairy foods are an outstanding source of nutrients and "beneficial bacteria."

Unfortunately, it's also a source of dangerous bacteria.

The organic dairy claims "Raw milk strengthens the immune system." And that organic raw milk has "many enzyme-based pathogen-killing systems." Apparently not enough of them.

"It has been theorized," says the organic company, "that the combination of grass feeding, no antibiotics used, no hormones, and low levels of grain used in the diet cause a change in the cow's immune system and rumen. This change in physiology inhibits pathogen development in the [organic] milk."

That isn't even a theory. It's a marketing lie, designed to wring a higher price from the consumer for a product that's condemned by health authorities because of its inherent dangers.

The FDA says drinking raw milk is playing Russian roulette with your health. Such milk-borne diseases as tuberculosis and undulant fever were epidemic in the days before pasteurized milk. Now the E. coli pathogens revealed the lie again.

The Sierra Club and the Natural Resources Defense Council are trying to blame "factory livestock farms" for the 0157 in the cattle manure. But a recent Swiss study found organic cows have as much 0157 as other cows. The U.S. Department of Agriculture says it's found the deadly 0157 in every cattle herd it's tested.

Our objective should be to get the manure away from our food crops. Organic and natural aren't safer, or more nutritious: Just more expensive, and far more dangerous.

Video stories
Most commented stories
Community calendar
Browse online archives
Recent issues:
Reader comments on this story - 12 total

Note: All views and opinions expressed in reader comments are solely those of the individual submitting the comment, and not those of the Pantagraph or its staff.

Wanda Leopold wrote on May 30, 2007 4:27 PM:

" In support of organic farming methods I will quote Paul Hawken of Blessed Unrest "How the Largest Movement in the World Came into Being and Why No One Saw It Coming" "Sustainable agriculture addresses a number of issues simultaneously: It reduces agricultural runoff, which is the main cause of eutrophication and dead zones in lakes, estuaries and oceans; it reduces use of energy-intensive nitrogen-based fertilizers; it ameliorates climate change because organic soil sequesters carbon, whereas industrial farming releases carbon dioxide to the atmosphere and is the second-greatest cause of climate change after fossil fuel combustion; it improves worker health because of the absence of toxic pesticides; it enables soil to retain more moisture and is thus less reliant on irrigation and outside sources of water; it is more productive than conventional agriculture; it is less susceptible to erosion; and it provides habitat for pollinators, birds and beneficial insects which promotes biodiversity. On top of all that, the resulting food commands a premium in the market, making small farms economically more viable." Another note, conventional agriculture allows the use of sewage sludge while Organic standards prohibit its use. "

Chicharronita wrote on Oct 27, 2006 4:43 PM:

" No one was sickened by drinking raw milk from Organic Pastures. The company tests its milk every day, and NO pathogens have EVER been found in the milk. Contrast this to milk from factory-farmed animals, where 30% of the milk tests positive for pathogens. However, since the pus and germs are sterilized through pasteurization, it is considered "safe" to drink. Sorry, BigAgra, but your food just doesn't cut it for those of us in the know. "

Amanda wrote on Oct 20, 2006 10:02 AM:

" actually genetically modified crops have saved billions throughout the world from starvation. I wouldn't say that organics should be treated as an evil of any sort, but let's not pretend that either is some sort of an evil in our world. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I-8DxHjRHNw "

Who do you work for? wrote on Oct 19, 2006 6:28 PM:

" A large, industrial farm by chance?? "

Terri wrote on Oct 19, 2006 10:16 AM:

" to LC: Yes, as I said Earthbound Farms and Dole are both part of Natural Selections, not the other way around. Dole, which is not organic was found to be a source of the e-coli, but Earthbound Farms was not. Natural Selections is the big umbrella. Earthbound Farms is being blamed wrongly. "

Leafy McGreenpants wrote on Oct 17, 2006 2:18 PM:

" There are some sick children in California who may disagree with this letter. No, they aren't victims of e coli contamination, but are instead victims of pesticides sprayed on crops. Their parents picked grapes in the 1970's and 1980's and these kids (some now adults) were born with massive birth defects. If you think that poisons aren't going into your body daily, then you are deluded. "

jwh wrote on Oct 16, 2006 9:16 AM:

" As Ronnie Cummins points out, it is the practice of agribusiness and biotech-funded think tanks...such as the Hudson Institute, of which Dennis Avery is Director and Alex Avery is director of research and "education"..."to discredit organic farming practices by saying that composted fertilizer containing animal manure, used as a non-chemical fertilizer on organic farms is dangerous." I've read many of Dennis Avery's writings and found most to lacking in fact. To me, he is as credible to the food industry as Donald Rumsfeld is to the U.S. military establishment. "

DLC wrote on Oct 16, 2006 8:23 AM:

" The chemicals that are put in the meats and dairy products are not good either. It's all about the money for the companies that are not organic. They want their cows to produce more grow bigger so they can get more money. The same with chickens, they want them to lay more eggs. It's all about more money for them, not about the consumer at all. I agree with Terri, facts need to be straight first before being printed. "

LC to Terri wrote on Oct 16, 2006 4:09 AM:

" Are you sure it listed Natural Selections as the GROWER. From what I have read Earthbound Farms products are sold under various names including Natural Selections. "

It just makes sense wrote on Oct 15, 2006 11:43 AM:

" If you are not treating crops or other food products for things that are bad or processing them using the methods that have developed over the years to make them not only safer but easier to grow then the final product will obviously not be as good for the end consumer. "

Terri wrote on Oct 15, 2006 10:17 AM:

" I wonder where this writer found a source identifying Earthbound Farms as the grower of this spinach. I just read the FDA report about it and it says Natural Selections was the grower. The only name brand listed in the positive testing was Dole, not Earthbound Farms. Dole's spinach is not organic. Both names are part of Natural Selections. Shouldn't viewpoint writers both start with the facts when so much time and money has been invested in ascertaining those facts? If you start with a false assumption, isn't everything that follows just hot air? Why do political people care about organic vs. conventional foods? Why would a responsible newspaper print a viewpoint that begins with a lie? Or is there new information that points to Earthbound Farms? Why doesn't the Pantagraph check these facts before they publish this waste of time? "

GolfFan wrote on Oct 15, 2006 6:10 AM:

" Geez, maybe we're finally seeing another chink in the Healthist's armor. It gives "Food for Life" a totally new dimension. How 'bout "Food for the Next Life." "

Add your own comments

Please read the rules before posting comments.

You must be logged in to leave comments.
If you don't have a member ID, please register.

*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
  Forgot Your Password?