Pantagraph.com Weather forecast, local radar and more
NewsMonday, October 23, 2006 9:44 PM CDT
Normal man sentanced in battery case
Advertisement

BLOOMINGTON — A Normal man was sentenced to two years of probation and 14 days in jail Monday for his involvement in a drunken melee last year.

David Bateman, 22, was one of four men who broke into an apartment and fought with a group of men on Sept. 11, 2005, during a fraternity party.

Bateman was initially charged with home invasion — a crime carrying a penalty of six to 30 years — but later pleaded guilty to the lesser charge of battery in a negotiated plea agreement.

Assistant State’s Attorney Sandra Thompson on Monday argued Bateman was the first person to break into the apartment in the 600 block of Broadway in Normal.

Thompson, who asked for a 2½-year sentence, said the intruders kicked in the door, threw eggs and caused other damage while fighting in the home.

Bateman said the altercation started after the occupants of the home, standing on a balcony, spat on his group of friends during a fraternity party at a nearby apartment.

“I know what I did was wrong,” Bateman said, blaming the incident on his friends during Monday’s sentencing. “I’m not saying I was at the wrong place at the wrong time, but I was definitely with the wrong people.”

Prosecutors on Monday also tried to link Bateman, an Illinois State University student, to another battery that occurred near campus earlier in the night.

Police said another ISU student identified Bateman as the person who punched him in the face during an attempted robbery in the 300 block of School Street.

Bateman told Judge Ronald Dozier that one of his friends punched the victim after his group of friends got kicked out of a different party.

The attempted robbery charge against Bateman was dismissed as part of the plea agreement in the battery case, according to prosecutors.

Video
Most commented stories
Browse online archives
Recent issues:
Reader comments on this story - 14 total

Note: All views and opinions expressed in reader comments are solely those of the individual submitting the comment, and not those of the Pantagraph or its staff.

NormalGuy wrote on Oct 29, 2006 9:03 AM:

" This is why these things occur; there is no deterrence to the crime. Probation and fourteen days in jail? People spend more time in jail than that before even receiving formal charges. What's this say to the other punks on campus? Go ahead and do whatever you feel like doing, you'll probably get away with it and if you don't, the sentence will be light. These spoiled little brats are ruining our society. Young people blame everyone but themselves for their misdeeds and problems. If we're going to make any progress in the courts, we have to make an example of punks like this guy. Also, I guess the University didn't expel him either as it still says that he's a student... great. "

JimmyTheBuddha wrote on Oct 25, 2006 9:38 AM:

" (“I know what I did was wrong,” Bateman said, blaming the incident on his friends.) Now that's funny writing. "

logical one wrote on Oct 24, 2006 6:12 PM:

" Don't be so nieve and believe that those kids in the apartment bldg. were sitting around on a weekend night playing checkers. Have you ever made a mistake in your life or are you in denial? This young man isn't in denial and admitted to his mistake and I believe Judge Dozier's sentencing was fair. "

he broke into a frat house wrote on Oct 24, 2006 3:48 PM:

" its not like you broke into a single family home and started attacking people for no reason. i am sure the fraternity provoked it and he just got in a group and made a stupid decision. I think his punishment is suffice. I imagine the people whose house he broke into would not even want him to go to jail for 6 years and ruin his life for making one stupid, relatively harmless mistake. "

College punks wrote on Oct 24, 2006 2:22 PM:

" Students think they can get away with anything these days. Just go through campus on a weekend night, it's just a big sloppy drunken brawl. And there are no consequences for any of them, unless they happen to be unlucky enough to get caught. This is what we get when we allow practically anyone (whose mommy and daddy will write the check) into school here. Anyone remember the days when going to college was a PRIVELEGE, and you actually had to WORK to support yourself while going to school? These ungrateful kids now would pass out from shock at the thought of these principles. "

Solution wrote on Oct 24, 2006 12:26 PM:

" If you want to know how to deal with drunken idiots who want to start fights at parties, I advocate pepper spray. Just shoot them in the eyes twice and call the cops on them. If people can't drink without having to hit other people, then they deserve it. Speaking of pepper spray, K's merchandise has canisters on sale for like $8 a piece. Anyone who is planning on having a party should have this stuff on hand. "

LESSON LEARNED wrote on Oct 24, 2006 12:17 PM:

" DO the crime, and no need to worry about doin time "

to reader&candy wrote on Oct 24, 2006 11:18 AM:

" where did he admit to it to me he blamed his buddies on the whole thing and he was identified in an earlier incident so the punishment doesnt fit the crime he should have gotten time in prison. Accidents happen but sounds like they were up to no good anyways "

Jennifer wrote on Oct 24, 2006 10:45 AM:

" To Just for Clarification: Yes, you will get probation, unless you have pot on you and then you'll get life in prison. Don't you know it's ok to harm others but not yourself? "

Just for clarification wrote on Oct 24, 2006 10:00 AM:

" So if I break into someone's home and attack them I can expect to get probation? "

TO READER & CANDY wrote on Oct 24, 2006 10:00 AM:

" The young man made a mistake and admitted to it so why not let it go at that. After he does the 14 days he will not want a replay. And you think you have the answer but just try your answer to the problem and you'll get a real good jail sentense. And to candy. YOU MUST BE A BUSH AND CLENTON FAN! JUST PUT THEM IN JAIL NO TRAIL NO COUNSLE JUST LOCK EM UP. And you believe they are guilty just cause some over paid cop say's they are. And you should never alowed to serve on any kind nof jury. AND YOU MOST LIKELY WON'T. And people like you are the reason we have lost most of our rights and freedon in the USA! "

to Candy wrote on Oct 24, 2006 9:59 AM:

" The judges are not the ones doing it. It's the prosecutors who keep cutting sweet deals to people. "

reader wrote on Oct 24, 2006 6:27 AM:

" That is why there is so much crime.No punishment.They wouldn't have to worry about a trial if they would of broken into my place.Just a respectable funeral home.ha ha "

Candy wrote on Oct 24, 2006 5:38 AM:

" 6 to 30 years would of been better. I know the courts are busy but they need to do away with all this negotiated plea agreement stuff. "

Add your own comments

Please read the rules before posting comments.

You must be logged in to leave comments.
If you don't have a member ID, please register.

*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
  Forgot Your Password?