Pantagraph.com Weather forecast, local radar and more
NewsFriday, November 3, 2006 9:48 PM CST
Baby sitter testifies in Hamm trial
Advertisement

DECATUR -- A baby sitter for three children who drowned in Clinton Lake three years ago regrets her failure to report suspected child abuse of the children to authorities.

“They’d probably be alive today,” Susan Swearingen told a Macon County jury during testimony in the murder trial of Amanda Hamm.

Hamm, 30, is accused of conspiring with then-boyfriend Maurice LaGrone to kill her three children, who drowned in September 2003 after their mother’s car sank in the lake. LaGrone is serving a life sentence for his role in the deaths.

Swearingen recounted an incident in August 2003 when Christopher Hamm, 6, told her LaGrone had put his 3-year-old Austin Brown’s head in the oven and turned it on. LaGrone allegedly was upset because the children were making noise while he was watching a basketball game, said Swearingen.

She said she attempted to tell Hamm about the boy’s accusations but Hamm said she was in a hurry and did not stop.

Defense attorney Steve Skelton asked Swearingen when she notified the state Department of Children and Family Services, the county or city police about the incident.

“I didn’t,” Swearingen answered. She said she did not see signs of physical abuse during the months she babysat the two boys and their 23-month-old sister, Kyleigh Hamm.

Skelton later told reporters that some defense witnesses may offer details that are not accurate. Some witnesses “may emotionally back track and make themselves feel better about what they didn’t do” to help the children, he said.

The former babysitter cried several times as she talked about the changes she saw in Hamm and the children after LaGrone moved into the family’s apartment in a public housing complex. Hamm stopped bringing food and the children went without baths and clean clothes, said Swearingen.

Swearingen was one of seven witnesses to testify Friday. The jury also saw a videotape of the road leading to the west-side boat access from Ill. Route 10.

Hamm took notes and talked with Skelton throughout the day’s proceedings.

The prosecution contends Hamm and LaGrone plotted to drown the children because they were in the way of plans to move to St. Louis where Hamm would attend college.

A Maroa woman testified she saw only LaGrone in the car as it pulled up behind her on the road leading to the boat ramp. Pam Weikle told investigators “it would be mind-boggling to me” if more than one adult were in the car. She said she saw one small boy standing in the back seat.

On Thursday, prosecutor Ed Parkinson said Hamm may not have been in the car when it went onto the boat ramp.

After Weikle testified, Skelton commented on the state’s theory of Hamm being outside the car when it was put on the ramp. “It’s a great theory, but it’s not true,” said Skelton.

Other witnesses Friday included a former waitress who served the couple and the children shortly before the drownings. Teresa Lynch, who now works for a Decatur psychiatrist scheduled to testify at the trial, said LaGrone seemed agitated at The Shack restaurant.

“They were really quiet and there wasn’t much of a family thing going on,” said Lynch.

When the trial resumes Monday, the state will call a Clinton boater who was the first person to see the car submerged in the lake. Police and rescue workers who pulled the children from the lake will follow.

Each side has estimated that testimony will take about a week.

Video
Most commented stories
Browse online archives
Recent issues:
Reader comments on this story - 10 total

Note: All views and opinions expressed in reader comments are solely those of the individual submitting the comment, and not those of the Pantagraph or its staff.

DCFS wrote on Nov 4, 2006 7:48 AM:

" Another inept, incompetent, bureaucratic Federal government department full of waste. I know how to fix it, lets raise our taxes and give them even more money to waste. "

citizen wrote on Nov 3, 2006 6:16 PM:

" Just saw Amanda's mother on TV seems that she is changing her story also. If anyone remembers she was on national TV shortly after the incident agreeing with the cops. Now she is trying to say that ther kids did not tell the babysitter these things, how would she know I don't believe she was there. "

no upper hand wrote on Nov 3, 2006 4:56 PM:

" I can tell you I'm a mandated reported, required by my employer. Being a "professional" doesn't give you any more pull then the next person. Nobody has pull over this atonomous, self-goverend, and self monitored, system. It needs an overhaul. "

to Agreed: wrote on Nov 3, 2006 4:17 PM:

" I too have reported neglect to DCFS. They did nothing, so I called again, and again, and again. I encouraged other family members to call as well. DCFS's biggest issue with my report was that I was not a licensed professional. So, I had the child's physician call. That still wasn't good enough. Now, 12 months later, they are finally doing something. Unfortunately, health-wise, it may be too late to completely undo all the damage. This child will have lifelong effects of neglect. If only DCFS has just listened to me. "

The Kids wrote on Nov 3, 2006 4:04 PM:

" If the grandmother would have taken the kids when she was asked by her daughter, they would still be alive too. "

Rest In Peace wrote on Nov 3, 2006 3:35 PM:

" DCFS kills kids to. Just ask Ronnie Hamilton "

dcfs wrote on Nov 3, 2006 3:29 PM:

" some fool posted on here that his neighborhood had alot of kids playing unattended in the street, so he calls dcfs on the parents. if dcfs is checking into a bunch of calls for kids playing ball in the street. how can they focus their attention to important matters. they're just weeding out real from stupid cases. not saying kids should play unattended in street is right. but it is a fact some parents let their kids run loose.. that is a small offense compared to REAL abuse. "

Agreed wrote on Nov 3, 2006 3:28 PM:

" Yes, DCFS is not all that it should be. Not to get completely off topic here, or say it isn't worth a try to call in abuse, but I personally have called in a neglect and "bad enviroment" situation, and was told I needed PROOF. Isn't that their job? Aren't they supposed to go and at least investigate the home and the children. The person I spoke to made it sound like I practically needed video tape of the abuse for them to even look into it. It is really sad! Like the other poster said... who knows it they would have checked out the kids or not?? "

to guilt wrote on Nov 3, 2006 2:41 PM:

" I agree w/ you. I hope this brings awareness about reporting abuse/neglect. On the same note, it will be imperative that DCFS starts taking these reports more seriously. A problem our community has had in the past. Even if this witness HAD reported Hamm to DCFS, it is unlikely they would have done anything. "

Guilt wrote on Nov 3, 2006 1:40 PM:

" Most of us feel it for knowing we should've done something more for a child whom we've suspected was abused emotionally or physically. There's a song out, "Allysa lies" about an abused little girl who ends up dying because no one did anything to help her. I heard it for the first time an hour ago and I cried my heart out. Maybe the one good thing to come out of all this will be more reporting of suspected abuse. "

Add your own comments

Please read the rules before posting comments.

You must be logged in to leave comments.
If you don't have a member ID, please register.

*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
  Forgot Your Password?