Pantagraph.com Weather forecast, local radar and more
NewsFriday, June 29, 2007 2:55 PM CDT
Bill would give tax breaks for preserving woodlands
Advertisement

SPRINGFIELD — A group of state lawmakers say they want to preserve the state’s woodlands by giving tax breaks to landowners who preserve their forested tracts.

The lawmakers gathered in the Capitol on Thursday with representatives from a handful of special interest groups to tout the tax. The measure would shelter woodlands from the same tax treatment as agricultural land or commercial lots.

State Sen. John Sullivan, D-Rushville, said differing county-by-county definitions of farmland are forcing some landowners to try to farm poor agricultural land, or sell their wooded property in the hope of avoiding a higher tax.

Sullivan said the plan would affect only those tracts of non-residential land of five acres or more and the potential tax savings are significant.

The proposal could mean the difference between a landowner paying more than $50 per acre in property taxes versus $1 or $2 per acre, said Sullivan.

The legislation is the product of several months of hearings by a taskforce which began meeting last December.

State Sen. John O. Jones, R-Mt. Vernon, said he has received hundreds of phone calls from constituents scared about losing their timbered land because they could not afford to pay more in property taxes.

Jones warned that the clearcutting of property to have it valued as farmland presents a threat to the environment.

“We all know how valuable trees are to our environment. Some of this land does not need to be in production,” he said. “Quite frankly it will be (washed) in our rivers if we start farming it, and we don’t want that.”

Todd Vandermyde, spokesman for the Illinois State Rifle Association, said Illinois has some of the best hunting in the nation but not enough of the land is preserved as wooded.

“The impact not having this (legislation) would have is that you would see a lot of ground that people currently allow hunting on to be clearcut and you would lose that habitat,” he said. “The last thing we need to be doing in Illinois these days is losing the hunting grounds that we have access to.”

The legislation, Senate Bill 17, awaits approval in both the House and Senate.

Video
Most commented stories
Browse online archives
Recent issues:
Reader comments on this story - 9 total

Note: All views and opinions expressed in reader comments are solely those of the individual submitting the comment, and not those of the Pantagraph or its staff.

"Greee-een Acres wrote on Jun 29, 2007 4:35 PM:

" is the place to be!/Faaaa-arm living is the life for me!" Gotta love all of these faux rustics that have blown out into the county since city taxes gave them cases of "th'vapors", and now they're all yeomen, woodsmen, and minutemen. There are probably no more than two dozen McLean County families who've owned their farms since before 1945, and we all know each other, and you - Eddie Albert, or Eddie Eagle - aren't from one of them. "

Senate Bill 17 wrote on Jun 29, 2007 2:54 PM:

" A landowner that has to pay $50.00 an acre in taxes for woodlands is being overcharged. "

to I.F. wrote on Jun 29, 2007 2:03 PM:

" Obviously the tax rate on woodlands should be a matter between only the State and real landowners. It's quite clear that those who see a lower tax rate as a 'deal with the devil' know nothing about either issue. So is a homeowner who takes advantage of Illinois' automatic $5,000 homestead exemption also playing into the hands of the militia and other 'anti-gubmit" groups? ('Ooohh... take more of my money as property taxes ... just don't let those evil gunowners use my basement for their meetings!!') How utterly shallow your thought processes must be (and that's giving you the benefit of the doubt on their existence). "

To : Fachina wrote on Jun 29, 2007 12:47 PM:

" Why do'nt you just comment on things you know about. Instead of shooting off your mouth about things you have no knowledge about. And belittleing people that live in rural area. Oh that is right in that case you could not write about anything!! "

The Imperturbable Fachna wrote on Jun 29, 2007 11:27 AM:

" is not worried about "gub'mint" access, but about the anti-"gub'mint" caperings of the Western Illinois Unregulated Militia frightening his cows, and shooting one another in the feet on his liability dime. Field Marshal Jed and Colonel Ned and their NRA/ISRA "minutemen" can practice for Armageddon someplace else. "

Taxpayer wrote on Jun 29, 2007 11:04 AM:

" Fachna attempted to say is "if the devil knocks at your door and you let him in you are to blame". I have timber and I will pay full taxes to keep the government at a long arms length from it. "

to Snide Commentor wrote on Jun 29, 2007 9:13 AM:

" Obviously Facha doesn't even OWN any timber. Otherwise he'd know that property taxes hold no relation to government access to the lands (think 4th Amendment), and even less to do with private access. I, on the other hand, DO own timber, which I actively work to preserve, and still have to pay the same property taxes as those who derive income from their tilled acreage. It's a question of fairness towards those who are good stewards of their lands, in an effort to encourage those efforts. Please, Facha, do not belittle the work of better citizens. "

Black Dirt wrote on Jun 29, 2007 9:07 AM:

" How about penalizing developers for stripping all the black dirt off subdivided land, leaving the homeowner with grass slapped on clay worthy of being used for pottery? Homeowners who buy new houses should be howling about this but we're all just sheep to be fleeced by these guys. "

The Imperturbable Fachna wrote on Jun 29, 2007 6:49 AM:

" If relief is conditioned upon opening my woodlands to Field Marshal Jed and Colonel Ned for manuevers, I'd just as soon pay the tax. And rely upon it, that will be one of the proposals. "

Add your own comments

Please read the rules before posting comments.

You must be logged in to leave comments.
If you don't have a member ID, please register.

*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
  Forgot Your Password?