Pantagraph.com Weather forecast, local radar and more
NewsFriday, August 24, 2007 7:09 PM CDT
Governor’s budget cuts nixed funds for addiction treatment
Advertisement

BLOOMINGTON — Addiction treatment providers say they are starved for money and people are waiting for help, but one of the governor’s budget cuts on Thursday cut much-needed relief.

Among $463 million in state budget cuts announced Thursday, Gov. Rod Blagojevich vetoed $6.6 million for the Department of Human Services for a cost-of-doing-business adjustment for addiction treatment providers. The money would have allowed for a 3 percent increase to cover the increased cost of goods and services.

The governor has said he trimmed the money from the $59 billion state budget to help free money to expand a health insurance program for poor people.

“This is somebody who said health care is a priority, and we have people in the state of Illinois who are in need of services. If that’s not health care, what is?” said Sara Moscato Howe, CEO of the Illinois Alcoholism and Drug Dependence Association.

Moscato Howe said there have been two such increases, one of 2.5 percent and one of 3 percent, since fiscal year 2001.

A spokesman with the governor’s Office of Management and Budget didn’t return a call Friday seeking comment.

A recent University of Illinois at Chicago survey, which was commissioned by Moscato Howe’s association, indicated the average wait to get into a state-funded addiction treatment center was 32.4 days. About 6,100 people were waiting for treatment and 370 more were waiting for a higher level of treatment, the study showed.

“We know that the $6.6 million would have allowed more people to receive assistance,” said state Sen. Bill Brady, R-Bloomington.

Bill Brady said it doesn’t appear likely the governor’s budget vetoes will be overridden.

Alan Sender, chief operating officer for Chestnut Health Systems, said the General Assembly’s version of the budget would have given more than $300,000 to Chestnut Health Systems’ facilities in McLean, Madison and St. Clair counties. The new money wouldn’t have increased capacity at his company’s facilities, but it would have covered increases in utility and medical costs and deserved raises for employees.

“The General Assembly stepped up and recognized the substance abuse field, which has been neglected for a long time,” Sender said.

But the governor’s cuts are “sort of a funny way of showing your support for health care,” Sender said.

Moscato Howe said treatment centers are struggling to fill positions because pay is too low, and none of the treatment center officials she has talked said they can sustain operations at the current level of funding.

State Rep. Dan Brady, R-Bloomington, said the governor’s health care goal is noble, but poorly timed.

“While there are some positive points of this budget, this budget was not helpful to our social service agencies or our human service agencies of this state,” Dan Brady said.

Video
Most commented stories
Browse online archives
Recent issues:
Reader comments on this story - 12 total

Note: All views and opinions expressed in reader comments are solely those of the individual submitting the comment, and not those of the Pantagraph or its staff.

fgw wrote on Aug 2, 2008 6:31 AM:

" My name is frank Wallace. In March of 2006 I entered Haymarket House after 25 years of substance abuse issues. I implore you to stand up for programs like Haymarket. Without them we the suffering addicts would have literally no place to turn. Take it from an ex-addict, we will, and do, resort to any means to get our "Fix" including criminal activities against innocent victims. Haymarket gave me back the option to choose a better way and I am forever grateful. That is why I have chosen to take up working as an addictions counselor. To help the next person seeking help and to show them the way out. I have had my last drink and drug and I will find a way to survive, but what will the addict that still suffers do? I don't know! I can only hope and pray that he doesn't kill himself or somebody else in the process. Do the right thing and help restore funding to treatment centers like Haymarket. Our society can’t afford to lose them, in more ways than you can even imagine. "

to the best... wrote on Aug 25, 2007 9:52 PM:

" And I know many people who have had numerous treatment for cancer, diabetes, heart disease. So let's not bother giving them another shot at treatment either. Love your "logic." Great analytical skills "

Re:To The Best wrote on Aug 25, 2007 4:56 PM:

" your impression is the least of my concern. Seeing taxpayer dollars put to work where they benefit the most people however is one of my main concerns. I have a family member who is a substance abuse counselor and I have an insight on how the state gets billed by companies such as Chestnut Healthcare. Instead of making pompaus posts in response to serious issues, I suggest you do a little research on this topic. Worse case scenario is that you may learn something, or would that be detrimental to your psyche? "

to the best and cheapest detox wrote on Aug 25, 2007 2:16 PM:

" wow...I bet you worked ALL week looking for a blog where you could use the word recidivism...should I be impressed, because I am most certainly not by your less than insightful post. "

NOT Kidding wrote on Aug 25, 2007 12:42 PM:

" I agree with BB. The addicts CHOOSE to try the junk in the first place. It is a moral weekness. One has to get their priorities straight. Seems like these addicts.. be it booze, cigs or illegal drugs, have that as their number one. God, family and work just get in their way of their own happiness. "

The Best And Cheapest Detox wrote on Aug 25, 2007 8:05 AM:

" is your local county jails. When drug addicts and I am including heroin addicts get arrested and are thrown in jail, do you think they get the benefit of detox? The answer is NO. They sit in cells and go through the DTs and other symptoms that come along with sobriety. This does not involve expensive drugs to counteract the illegal drugs these people have been pumping into their systems for who knows how long, and the suicide rate for addicts locked up is extremely low. The medical profession has the public duped into thinking addicts all suffer tremendously and physically when they dry out to the point they need special care. I loathe gov. blowdryer but this is one cut he made that is a smart one. I know dozens of people who have checked into rehab, spent months inside and came out and are right back on drugs. This for many is a vacation where they can get free room and board. Of course the taxpayers pick up the tab. If rehab is so great why do they have such a high rate of recidivism? People have to want to stay clean, and they obviously choose not too. "

You're kidding me, right? wrote on Aug 24, 2007 11:55 PM:

" Billy Bob, thanks for your medical analysis of addiction. Thjat med school education really paid off. Even ignorant individuals realize that no one "chooses" to become addicted. The fact that the medical community has long recognized that addiction is a MEDICAL condition has been long accepted. Except, of course, by esteemed medical experts such as yourself. Now, if we treat people who want to kick their addiction, they might work and pay taxes, stay out of prison and tend to their children. Why would we want them to do that? "

BILLY BOB wrote on Aug 24, 2007 9:08 PM:

" A great portion of health care funding goes to fund addiction care. An addiction is a self enduced illness. It is not viral or bacterial. Self enduced meaning "I CHOSE to get addicted to drugs or alcohol or tobacco. Hardworking tax payers are not and should not be burdoned with the expense of self inflicted deseases. I would rather spend my tax dollars on care for the elderly or research for a cure of cancer. Don't whine to me about someones poor choice of "recreational" addictions. "

Andy wrote on Aug 24, 2007 8:53 PM:

" Telling people they are addicted just gives them an excuse to continue their ways. They can keep doing what they do because they "feel" they have a problem that they can not overcome. "Addiction" is a moral weakness. If you actually do become physically addicted and there is no way to stop your habit (impossible), it is still your fault for starting in the first place. Any habit can be kicked anyway. Mind over matter. I am sick of paying ANYTHING for addicts. This "cut" doesn't go far enough. Good work on this Rod, but there is more to be done! "

J R O wrote on Aug 24, 2007 8:42 PM:

" Another fine example of the single-party political system in America. "

Whos Getting A Peice of This Pie? wrote on Aug 24, 2007 7:42 PM:

" Gov. Blowdryer does not do anything with tax dollars unless he gets his fair share. So with his insistence on Health Care I have to wonder who is paying him off? This is the Democratic Party we are talking about the party who is for healing, are addicted people not sick? It seems to me that the hypocrocy of the democrats surely are shining through on this one and if the rehab centers would have been more generous with kickbacks to the gov. they would have the funds and not the HMOs. Funny how the Chicago democrats work isn't it? "

Best treatment for addiction wrote on Aug 24, 2007 7:38 PM:

" I am gonna get a pistol and when some crackhead tries to steal from me to support his 'poor' addiction, I'll shoot 'em in the head. They will be cured of the addiction without needing rehab and they won't fall of the wagon. (notice I used no gender specific pronouns.) "

Add your own comments

Please read the rules before posting comments.

You must be logged in to leave comments.
If you don't have a member ID, please register.

*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
  Forgot Your Password?