| Subscribe Now |
![]() |
|
| Weather |
Bloomington-Normal, Illinois
|
| Home |
| NewsFriday, August 31, 2007 9:26 AM CDT |
Landowner: Offer for pipeline easement is 'highway robbery'
BLOOMINGTON — Enbridge Inc. made its pitch Thursday night to construct a crude-oil pipeline through McLean County farmland, and one landowner called it “highway robbery.” Enbridge, which has already filed for eminent-domain powers in case negotiations fail, offered landowners a one-time payment for an easement at least 60 feet wide to construct the pipeline. Company representative Doug Aller said the payments would be equal to the “fair market value” of the land. Someone with a 1-mile-long easement covering about 6 acres, for example, could get around $5,000 per acre, or about $30,000. Those figures could change depending on appraisals, he said. “That’s highway robbery. You’re greedy,” shouted landowner Bob Kelley of rural Normal. Enbridge officials met Thursday with landowners at the Interstate Center in Bloomington to discuss their plans and answer any questions regarding negotiations with landowners. The Canadian company wants to construct a 170-mile pipeline from Pontiac to Patoka in southern Illinois to funnel 400,000 barrels of crude oil daily to meet the growing demand of refineries throughout the Midwest. The project affects about 95 landowners in McLean County, 68 in Livingston County and 65 in DeWitt County, and Enbridge spokesman Joe Martucci has repeatedly said eminent domain — government authority to compel property owners to sell land at market value for public good — is a last option. Nearly 100 people attended Thursday’s meeting. Those in attendance expressed a variety of concerns, from the effects on farmland to the possibility of a second pipeline down the road. While Enbridge doesn’t have plans for a second pipeline, Aller said the company would have to pay landowners a second time to build a second pipeline. In addition, the company signed an agreement with the Illinois Department of Agriculture that should protect farmland during and after construction, said Terry Savko, an ag department official who spoke at the meeting. Lexington resident Tom Fulop, meanwhile, worried about the environmental void left if all the mature trees were cut down along the entire 60-foot-wide easement running along his property. “That can’t be replaced,” he said. “How will you compensate for the lost aesthetics?” That will be negotiated, Aller said, and negotiations will begin within a month. |
|
||||||
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Top of Page | Home | News | Sports | Free Time | Life | Money | Nation/World | Opinion | Blogs/Columns | Archives | Site Map | RSS
Copyright © 2008, Pantagraph Publishing Co. and Lee Enterprises. All rights reserved. | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
|