Pantagraph.com Weather forecast, local radar and more
NewsThursday, September 13, 2007 4:42 PM CDT
Unit 5: Security technology on priority list
Advertisement

NORMAL — In the future Unit 5 students could use an electronic pass like the tollway I-Pass that would let them board buses or allow them to be tracked on designated walking routes.

The Normal-based school district also could add an emergency notification system for parents and tie campus cameras into the police department.

Those technologies were among security measures discussed at Wednesday night’s school board meeting. Other topics included enrollment growth and plans for a construction referendum.

“Past events warrant immediate action to facilitate improvement in every area,” said Loren Baele, the district’s director of technology.

He also said the district needs to improve its data center, including adding a backup power supply, and revamp the district’s Web site.

The district already has agreed to install more security cameras at Normal Community and Normal Community West high schools.

The discussion of security seemed apt following school lockdowns in three different school districts in the last three weeks. Officials found guns in a locker at Pontiac Township High School, a bomb threat at Dwight Township High School and an ammunition clip on a Tri-Valley school bus.

Board member Mark Pritchett said the district doesn’t have the staff to make all the technology improvements needed.

A combination of contracting some projects, and hiring staff would likely be considered, Superintendent Gary Niehaus said.

“It will take serious thought on how to do that,” Pritchett said.

Space concerns

On another topic, the board heard enrollment continues to grow, pushing the need for more space.

Enrollment grew by 3 percent, to 12,456, from Aug. 31, 2006, to Aug. 31, 2007, said John Pye, assistant superintendent of operations and human resources.

The largest increase came in elementary schools, where 251 more students this year represented a 4.3 percent increase over last year. This led to adding an extra class at Glenn, Parkside and Fairview elementary schools.

Board member Gail Ann Briggs said that if the district wants to have a referendum question for building and future operation expenses on the Feb. 5 ballot, it must decide by Dec. 3.

“We’ve got some real tight time frames to make all these decisions,” Niehaus said, noting background work already is being done.

In recent weeks, the district and public have collaborated to define the scope of the $100 million to $120 million proposed building project.

The proposal now encompasses building two elementary schools and a middle school, adding to Sugar Creek Elementary School, considering a future high school and upgrading current buildings, said board member John Puzauskas, a member of the architectural planning committee.

Video
Most commented stories
Browse online archives
Recent issues:
Reader comments on this story - 8 total

Note: All views and opinions expressed in reader comments are solely those of the individual submitting the comment, and not those of the Pantagraph or its staff.

Money for Nothing, CHicks for Free wrote on Sep 15, 2007 2:53 PM:

" Unit Five is in favor of any measure which would secure more money for them - that is their security plan....how to secure their exorbitant salaries and pensions. Now if they could only get rid of those pesky students which tie up their day, they could sit around longer and discuss more ways of fleecing the taxpayers for more money. "

Emily wrote on Sep 13, 2007 1:20 PM:

" Do you really think that if the students can't remember to carry their id badge now that they will remember in the future with this new 'I Pass" thing? Or are we going to put a tracker chip in each of the kids so we can find out if they go the wrong direction and them zap them like people do with dogs? "

NCWSH Mom... wrote on Sep 13, 2007 12:47 PM:

" Ok so lets get the administration under control first before we have tracking devices. I feel each principal should take a step back and see how stupid of an idea this is. "

Going off the deep end wrote on Sep 13, 2007 9:53 AM:

" this is just plain insane let track the children with RFID like pallets in a warehouse. What this really means is that each child will have a radio transponder probably just a little more powerful version of the "proximity cards" that State Farm uses. There will be "gateway" scanners on each bus, each building door, if they really intend to track walking routs there will be ones at given points along the sidewalk. I think that this is just plain weird and frankly a little freaky. Don't fall under the "think of the children" mentality. All that gear is a total wast of money. "

Republican wrote on Sep 13, 2007 8:26 AM:

" "Those who give up freedom for security deserve neither freedom nor security" People who will give up their freedoms and privacy for security fail to see the bigger picture here. Americans are the proverbial "Frog in the boiling water". The gov't keeps turning up the heat slowly and we won't realize until it's too late to jump, that we're being cooked! "

Concerned wrote on Sep 13, 2007 8:19 AM:

" This trend toward tracking everyone is disturbing. I agree with "George Orwell" just posted. Will someone bring forth some reality? The prophecy in Revelations 13:16, 17 is right up to date where no one can buy or sell without the mark of the beast. This new idea means that no one can get on the bus without their ID or walk on the other street. Why do we want to give up our privacy? This fits right in with the "Real ID" that will track you wherever you go. Also, the information you have to give to get a passport to go to Canada or anywhere else is invasive. When you get home, they want to know where you are going and what transportation you are taking to get there. "

Real Pro wrote on Sep 13, 2007 7:27 AM:

" Security is just a function of money...how secure do you want to make our schools ? "

George Orwell wrote on Sep 13, 2007 5:32 AM:

" Maybe we should just act like Big Brother under the guise of "protecting" our children. We would know exactly where everyone is at all times. Sounds like perfect control to me. "

Add your own comments

Please read the rules before posting comments.

You must be logged in to leave comments.
If you don't have a member ID, please register.

*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
  Forgot Your Password?