Pantagraph.com Weather forecast, local radar and more
NewsMonday, October 15, 2007 12:49 PM CDT
Pink campaign doesn't tickle everyone
Advertisement

MOUNT LAUREL, N.J. -- October used to be shrouded in black and orange, but in recent years, pink has nudged into the palette.

It seems just about every product you can buy - from Indianapolis Colts mini-helmets to M&M candies, from Avaya phone faceplates to Yoplait yogurt - is available in pink, or at least pink packaging, as part of a promotion to raise awareness and money for breast cancer research.

The companies say the "cause marketing" campaigns do good for the world - and they're not bad for sales, either.

It may sound like an idea that's hard to argue with, but all the pink has some people seeing red.

"Pink Ribbons, Inc.," a book published last year by Samantha King, a professor at Queen's University in Ontario, found fault with the way corporate sponsorship has put the emphasis in finding a cure rather than figuring out why the cancer rate is so high.

And for five years now, the San Francisco-based group Breast Cancer Action, which bills itself as the "bad girls of breast cancer," has been running an anti-pink product campaign called "Think Before You Pink."

The group's executive director, Barbara Brenner, a breast cancer survivor who never wears a pink ribbon herself, says that in many cases corporate images get what she calls a "pinkwash" while the cause gets nominal donations.

"Awareness, we don't need any more of," she said. "We have plenty of awareness. The question is what we do now."

The pink sales campaigns are probably the biggest and best-known efforts in the world of "cause marketing," where companies team up with charities with the aim of bringing in more money for both.

Apple Inc. sells red iPods as part of the big (PRODUCT) RED effort of the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria and Build-A-Bear Workshop Inc. sells a stuffed giraffe whose proceeds support the World Wildlife Federation. Then, there's Newman's Own, the food company that gives its profits to various causes.

The first blockbuster cause marketing campaign came in 1983, when American Express Co. announced it would contribute money to restoring Ellis Island and the Statue of Liberty based on how much its customers charged.

Applications for the card spiked, card use peaked, and $1.7 million was raised.

And corporate America had a new sales pitch. "It focused a lot of attention that you could motivate consumers by appealing to the best in them," said David Hessekiel, president of Cause Marketing Forum, a Rye, N.Y., company that puts on workshops about cause marketing.

In 1982, the Dallas-based foundation now known as Susan G. Komen for the Cure began trying to get attention for breast cancer, a deadly and common disease that wasn't much talked about.

It started getting attention with its Race for the Cure. Some of the sponsors of the walk/run started marketing campaigns around the cause.

Now, those campaigns are a juggernaut.

In the last fiscal year, which ended March 31, Komen says it brought in more than $58 million from corporate sponsors. Much of that money came from peddlers of pink products, though some was also from Race for the Cure national sponsorships.

Nearly 140 companies are currently running promotions to support Komen; additional companies are using pink and contributing to other breast-cancer causes.

In the past 25 years, Komen has invested nearly $1 billion in breast cancer research, education and support. The interest it has raised is one reason government spending on the disease has grown in that time from $30 million per year to about $900 million per year.

Cause Marketing Forum's Hessekiel sees breast cancer as a natural for cause marketing because it reaches women, who do much of the nation's shopping, and because it's linked to the pink, which makes a handy symbol.

Last year, the Camden-based Campbell Soup Co. made a special pink version of its famous red-and-white cans of chicken noodle and tomato soups for Cincinnati-based Kroger Co. It sold 7 million pink cans at the stores.

This year, Campbell is making 14 million pink cans and shipping them to 60 grocery chains around the country that comprise nearly two-thirds of supermarkets.

While some pink products are sold at a higher price, the pink soup is marked down - with a special 3 cans for $5 deal.

As part of the deal, the stores are giving Campbell special space to display the pink cans.

Last year, the pink cans sold at Kroger better than the red-and-white ones usually do. Company spokesman John Faulkner would not say whether the company's bottom-line improved because of the promotion.

"It allows us to support the cause, and support it in a very visible way," Faulkner said.

While some companies make contributions based on sales volume, Campbell is simply giving a total of $300,000 to three breast cancer-related charities, including $100,000 to Komen.

Though it's hard to prove, Breast Cancer Action's Brenner says some companies spend more promoting their pink stuff than they donate.

As long as the contributions are substantial, that's not troubling to supporters of cause marketing.

Hessekiel said the companies are in the business of making money, after all.

"They could decide that they're going to put cartoon characters on their package and pay a licensing fee," he said. "And none of that money would be going to charity."

Komen certainly does not mind if the companies that support it sell more because of it. "Cause marketing is one of the things people implement when they believe in doing well while also doing good," said Katrina McGhee, vice president of marketing at Komen.

Both Komen and Breast Cancer Action give similar advice to consumers: Make sure you know which charities benefit and how much they will get.

Brenner takes it a step further, though. She says it might be better just to write a check to a charity rather than buy the blushed goods.

On the Net:

Susan G. Komen for the Cure: http://www.komen.org

Breast Cancer Action's Thank Before You Pink campaign: http://www.thinkbeforeyoupink.org

Cause Marketing Forum: http://www.causemarketingforum.com

Video
Most commented stories
Browse online archives
Recent issues:
Reader comments on this story - 5 total

Note: All views and opinions expressed in reader comments are solely those of the individual submitting the comment, and not those of the Pantagraph or its staff.

Alpha-bits Male wrote on Oct 16, 2007 10:28 AM:

" It would be nice if there was a little of "awareness" that could be devoted to men's ailments, too. "

Mary Ellen Rix wrote on Oct 16, 2007 8:52 AM:

" So I am to assume that I should not voice an opinion in The Pantagraph as it does nothing to change the laws. It does hopefully make people realize that women die and suffer from more cancers and diseases than breast cancer. I am using my vote to choose candidates that are trying to do something more than wear pink t-shirts and buy products that in October are wrapped in pink packaging. Women are smarter than that so let's do what we can by making ourselves aware and choosing wisely when in the voting booth and when choosing to donate to causes. "

I totally agree with wrote on Oct 15, 2007 1:23 PM:

" Ok what... and Mary Ellen.. but if you really are that passionate about attention to other diseases, then write your congressmen, write your senetors, write every politician you can come up with - they are the ones who decide where money is spent by our government. Writing to the pantagraph online accomplishes nothing. "

Mary Ellen Rix wrote on Oct 15, 2007 12:32 PM:

" Fighting breast cancer is important work but we need to start thinking beyond that one type of cancer. People need our concern, prayers and funds for many, many different types of cancer. I feel that women are being used to generate awareness but also to help put money in people's pockets as they know women get behind causes and work together. Women are dying from uterine, bladder and brain cancers also. Let's also get our government to fund more clinical trials so that our loved ones can benefit and live longer, healthier lives years from now. Currently funding has been slashed for these clinical trials. Two of my family members would be dead now if they had not received the benefits of previous clinical trials. "

ok what about the rest of us? wrote on Oct 15, 2007 12:14 PM:

" I definitely support the cause for a cure for breast cancer. However, there are other non-curable diseases that seem to not get attention except maybe once a year. I'm not speaking for all of us who have Multiple Sclerosis, we don't have a cure either...I've seen cases where after some chemo and radiation (I feel bad people have to go through these types of treament) their cancer can go into remission. Where those of us with MS we go day to day waking up not knowing what might "hit" us today...like am I going to be able see, walk, stay awake, pick up items (lose strength), lose continence etc. As I said I support breast cancer awareness but there are others that need to be brought to the publics attention as well. Not just once a year when there's the MS Walk. Sorry if I may offend anyone. "

Add your own comments

Please read the rules before posting comments.

You must be logged in to leave comments.
If you don't have a member ID, please register.

*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
  Forgot Your Password?