Customer Service Place an Ad Become a Carrier Contact Us About Us Mobile Edition E-Mail Updates Report Cancellation Submit Milestone
| Subscribe Now Customer Service Place an Ad Become a Carrier Contact Us About Us Mobile Edition E-Mail Updates Report Cancellation Submit Milestone
|
 |
 |
|
Weather  Calendar Obituaries Classifieds Jobs Autos Homes Rentals Coupons Ad Center Gift Finder |
Bloomington-Normal, Illinois
|
Home News Sports
Free Time Life Money Nation/World Opinion Blogs/Columns Archives Site Map |
| NewsFriday, October 19, 2007 9:28 PM CDT |
 Comments (6) |  E-mail this page |  Print this page |  Enlarge type |  Reduce type |  Search archives |  RSS feeds |  Add to My Yahoo! |
FDA weighs safety of cold drugs for kids
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Cold and cough medicines given to infants and toddlers work no better than dummy pills and can be dangerous, pediatricians seeking to curb their use told government health advisers Thursday. The doctors told the Food and Drug Administration advisers that the over-the-counter medicines shouldn't be given to children younger than 6 because they don't help them and aren't safe. Such a prohibition would go beyond last week's drug industry move to eliminate sales of the nonprescription drugs targeted at children under 2. The group petitioned the FDA seeking in part a government statement saying the medications shouldn't be used in older children as well. The expert advisers began a two-day meeting to consider the issue. The FDA has yet to act, in part pending a recommendation expected late Friday from the joint panel of outside experts in pediatrics and nonprescription drugs, said the agency's Dr. Joel Schiffenbauer. The medicines have been marketed for use in children for decades, with drug companies spending $50 million a year on heart-tugging ads in parenting magazines and elsewhere. Still, it has long been acknowledged there is little or no data from studies in the very young to show the medicines are safe and work. Worse, some studies suggest the medicines are no better than dummy pills in treating cold and cough symptoms in young children, the petitioners said. "When a treatment is ineffective, its risks - if not zero - always will exceed its benefits," said Dr. Michael Shannon, a Children's Hospital Boston pediatrician and Harvard Medical School professor who was another of the petitioners. The drug industry, meanwhile, maintains the widely used medicines are safe and work but can lead to death and injury from overdoses or misuse in infants. It estimates children receive 3.8 billion doses of the medicines a year. "The vast majority of consumers are using these medicines properly and serious adverse events are rare," said Linda Suydam, president of the Consumer Healthcare Products Association, which represents makers of over-the-counter drugs. The meeting opened a week after drug makers pulled from sale oral cough and cold medicines for children under 2. The labels on those medicines had recommended parents "ask a doctor" before giving them to children that young - advice that seemingly did little to rein in their use. "We all have a lot of friends who call up their pediatricians and the pediatricians tell them to take the drugs," said panelist Ralph D'Agostino, a Boston University public health and statistics expert. The drug industry now says simply that the medicines shouldn't be used in that age group. The petitioners, including Baltimore city health officials, are pushing to expand that to those under 6. The drugs - they include some Dimetapp, Pediacare, Robitussin and Triaminic products - have never been tested in children, which a previous FDA panel noted as long ago as 1972. Drug makers instead have used extrapolated data from studies in adults to come up with dosing recommendations based on a child's age or size. While the focus of the petition and the FDA is on children under 6, the joint panel of experts will be asked if there's evidence that these drugs work in children up to age 12. Some panelists seemed reluctant Thursday to believe the claim by petitioners the medicines don't work and are dangerous, citing the volumes in which they are used. "If these medicines are allegedly not effective or materially unsafe, how is the purchase of millions - hundreds of millions - of doses by parents explained?" asked Dr. George Goldstein, the panel's nonvoting industry representative. Dr. Dan Levy, president of the Maryland chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics, said parents buy the medicines for their children because they want quick results. Earlier, Levy also said parents also do so for emotional reasons - out of fear, vulnerability and caring. Questions from panelists also touched on what alternatives parents can turn to in seeking care for their sick children. "Are there safe and effective therapies for the common cold?" asked panelist Dr. Ruth Parker, an Emory University School of Medicine professor. Petitioner Dr. Joshua Sharfstein, Baltimore's health commissioner and a pediatrician had a simple, time-tested answer. "Love. Liquids. That's what I recommend." E-mail this story | Print this story | Search archives | RSS Show comments |  Hide comments | Hide comments on all stories |
|
||||||
|
 |
|
Top of Page | Home | News | Sports | Free Time | Life | Money | Nation/World | Opinion | Blogs/Columns | Archives | Site Map | RSS
Customer Service | 301 W. Washington St., PO Box 2907, Bloomington, IL 61701-2907 | Ph. 309-829-9000 | 800-747-7323
Copyright © 2009, Pantagraph Publishing Co. and Lee Enterprises. All rights reserved. | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
|