Pantagraph.com Weather forecast, local radar and more
NewsFriday, October 19, 2007 9:28 PM CDT
Landfill waste question OK’d for Feb. 5 ballot
Advertisement

CLINTON — DeWitt County residents will get the chance to voice their opinions on whether to allow the disposal of chemical waste at the Clinton Landfill.

The DeWitt County Board voted 6-5 Thursday to place a nonbinding referendum on the Feb. 5 ballot, following the suggestion of a newly-formed group opposed to such waste disposal.

In September, the board unanimously approved an amendment to the landfill host agreement which indicated it supported landfill owner Area Disposal Service Inc. in its effort to get a federal permit for chemical waste disposal.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has the final say on the permit.

Matt Varble, president of WATCH (We’re Against Toxic Chemicals) spoke to the County Board Thursday night to request the referendum.

“WATCH feels it is important that all voters be given the opportunity to express their opinion,” Varble said. “Any action other than a ‘yes’ vote — such as tabling the matter or voting it down — will be viewed as an indication that this board does not want public input on this matter.”

At issue is the storage of PCBs, a group of toxic, carcinogenic organic compounds.

Such chemicals already are legally being stored there, said Ron Edwards, vice president of Peoria Disposal Co., Area’s parent company. A change in government regulations, however, is forcing the landfill to apply for a new permit to continue to store those materials, he said.

When the issue of the permit first arose this summer, company officials said it was needed as part of a planned expansion at the landfill and that it didn’t automatically mean the landfill would take a wider range of hazardous materials. Edwards said that explanation needed to be clarified to stress that the company is simply continuing something it already does.

Opponents of the proposal say the landfill is too close to the Mahomet Aquifier, which provides much of the drinking water for Central Illinois. If that water source were to be contaminated, several thousand area residents could be affected, they say.

Edwards told the County Board on Thursday the process for applying for the permit is continuing.

Landfill officials say they hope to ease public concerns by offering a public open house on Oct. 27 and by being willing to answer any questions or concerns.

“We are satisfied that the county did the right thing and are going to let the public have their say,” Varble said. “Our work isn’t done though. We still need to get the word out that these chemicals could be hazardous to our community.”

Video
Most commented stories
Browse online archives
Recent issues:
Reader comments on this story - 6 total

Note: All views and opinions expressed in reader comments are solely those of the individual submitting the comment, and not those of the Pantagraph or its staff.

Kim Gaff wrote on Oct 26, 2007 11:36 AM:

" I am glad to see residents interested and involved in what is happening in our community. However, it troubles me that because 5 people have expressed a vote that my be contrary to some of these contributors, does not mean that these 5 have not served their county well. They voted according to the information that they have had time to study. Obviously, the public needs much more information before we can garner a vote on Feb. 5th. Until then, please do NOT propose to oust 5 people who have given much time and effort to their constituents over one subject. It is simply not fair. "

Question wrote on Oct 24, 2007 12:32 PM:

" So you support Chemical Waste PCB's being stored above the aquifer? "

A Clinton WATCHer wrote on Oct 20, 2007 10:44 PM:

" I'm curious...would the "five who need to be replaced"...be on that list because they: a. voted their conscience b. are targeted for their politics c. are being villified by a human resource guy who was able to pull a website together and get some people stirred up with some inaccuracies and now "Bob" gets the tar and feathers out It's just a curiosity with me as these comments seem to be serving a cause other than fact finding. You gotta wonder where these same rabble rousers are when there are real environmental concerns facing the county. Where were they at the land use meetings when unprotected junkyards were being addressed? The same county board members being targeted for this regulated landfill were working hard to close up largely unregulated junkyards. And, yet no "WATCH" group appeared to help them out. Hmmm...could there be an ulterior motive behind the WATCH group trying to manipulate public opinion? "The Good and the Bad", indeed! "

The Good and the Bad wrote on Oct 19, 2007 3:29 PM:

" Motion Carries 6-5 Yes Votes : 6 No Votes: 5 Steve Lobb (chairman)- Yes, Melonie Tilley - Yes, Mike Bray - Yes, Larry Martin - No, Levi Sturgeon - Yes, Chuck Moore - Yes Welby Cyrulik - No, Pete Daughetry - Yes Ed Young - No, Jeff Pearl - No Dave Newberg - No, Laura Enger - Absent "

mso wrote on Oct 19, 2007 10:22 AM:

" I agree with Bob. I don't understand why they feel the need to rush this through. It seems odd that they are not the least bit concerned about our drinking water. The people elected them now they don't want the people to have a voice. I know who not to vote for. "

Bob wrote on Oct 19, 2007 6:10 AM:

" Looks like 5 board members need to be replaced. "

Add your own comments

Please read the rules before posting comments.

You must be logged in to leave comments.
If you don't have a member ID, please register.

*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
  Forgot Your Password?