Pantagraph.com Weather forecast, local radar and more
NewsSunday, October 21, 2007 11:23 PM CDT
Comments Comments (2) | E-mail this page E-mail this page | Print this page Print this page | Enlarge type Enlarge type | Reduce type Reduce type | Search archives Search archives | RSS RSS feeds | Add to My Yahoo! Add to My Yahoo!
Loopholes keep some misconduct records secret
By Juliet Williams
Associated Press
Advertisement

SACRAMENTO, Calif. — More than 300 California educators had their teaching licenses revoked or suspended because of sex-related offenses from 2001 through 2005.

But you can’t tell that from the state’s enforcement records — at least not those available to the public.

While some of the most egregious sex abuse is flagged, state law allows many offenses to remain confidential in education records, even when teachers go to prison and register as sex offenders.

The lack of information reflects a system for disciplining teachers that, across the country, is often shrouded in secrecy. That makes it difficult for states to share valuable information about errant teachers, and allows some to find other jobs in the classroom.

In California alone, The Associated Press reviewed more than 2,000 cases in which teachers there were punished for misconduct. Among them were hundreds of cases classified as “general misconduct.”

The case of Tanda Rucker, a former college basketball star who taught and coached girls basketball at Encinal High School near Oakland, was one of those. After several teens each reported having a sexual relationship with Rucker, she pleaded no contest to 18 felony counts. She was sentenced to a year in jail and ordered to register as a sex offender.

Yet an official bulletin from California’s Commission on Teacher Credentialing reported only that Rucker’s teaching credential was revoked for misconduct under broad sections of state law that cover everything from theft to murder.

Problems with ‘no contest’

The AP review found dozens of similar cases, often involving pleas of no contest, a common legal agreement that allows one to avoid a trial or civil liability, but still leads to conviction. California law also bars the credentialing commission from revealing the reason teachers who plead no contest lose their licenses.

It’s a dangerous loophole, says Assemblyman Todd Spitzer, a Republican from Orange County.

“There is the possibility that one of these people could move to another jurisdiction, most likely another state, and you wouldn’t be able to find out their history,” says Spitzer, a former prosecutor and high school English teacher.

State-to-state problems

Here’s how it can happen: California submits information on teachers who lose their licenses to a national database. But because of California’s law, the state only provides limited details. So officials in another state may find out that someone they want to hire had a problem in California, but it’s nearly impossible for them to learn more from education records.

In some cases, school officials have only a one-year window to access California disciplinary records.

That came into play in 2002, after California granted a probationary license to Craig Kinder. He’d been forced out of a suburban St. Louis district amid accusations that he’d touched students inappropriately. Kinder was acquitted on criminal charges — but California officials gave him a license only on the condition that he tell prospective employers about his past.

He didn’t do that when he applied at California’s Newport-Mesa Unified School District.

And by the time district officials figured out he’d lied, the state — and the very California agency that required Kinder to disclose his history — had sealed his disciplinary records.

That made it tough to fire Kinder, says Lorri McCune, then the district’s assistant superintendent of human resources.

“This to me was a gross miscarriage of their responsibility,” McCune says. “We had basically no recourse, which really made me sick.”

Eventually, Kinder voluntarily surrendered his California license in 2003, after the Newport-Mesa district spent hundreds of thousands of dollars trying to force him out.

Video
Most commented stories
Browse online archives
Recent issues:
Reader comments on this story - 2 total

Note: All views and opinions expressed in reader comments are solely those of the individual submitting the comment, and not those of the Pantagraph or its staff.

misleading headline wrote on Oct 21, 2007 2:47 PM:

" It's important to note that "loopholes" is pretty much an inaccurate term to apply here. When allegations are made, they are nothing until proven. Teachers have a right to have personal records remain private, and to not be labeled and blackballed from their careers based upon unproven allegations. The example of Craig Kinder in this article is perfect - allegations which were unproven in that he was acquitted in court. States and schools have no business telling someone they have to quit their job based upon allegations of conduct that may have never occurred. Only in proven cases should someone be fired or denied a job, and personal records in these cases should be sealed for that very reason. "

Stinko wrote on Oct 21, 2007 8:50 AM:

" Now I know why I was denied access to certain records in a case like mentioned here. In this incident, the teacher made a deal with the school board after an accusation/incident occurred. He was let go without any record of what happened. He moved on to the next school with no record but was later caught with child porn. "
Add your own comments

Please read the rules before posting comments.

You must be logged in to leave comments.
If you don't have a member ID, please register.

*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
  Forgot Your Password?
 
Top of Page | Home | News | Sports | Free Time | Life | Money | Nation/World | Opinion | Blogs/Columns | Archives | Site Map | RSS
Weather | Calendar | Obituaries | Classifieds | Jobs | Autos | Homes | Rentals | Coupons
Lee Enterprises Customer Service | 301 W. Washington St., PO Box 2907, Bloomington, IL 61701-2907 | Ph. 309-829-9000 | 800-747-7323
Copyright © 2009, Pantagraph Publishing Co. and Lee Enterprises. All rights reserved. | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy