Pantagraph.com Weather forecast, local radar and more
NewsTuesday, November 20, 2007 4:37 PM CST
Condoms for inmates: A tough sell politically
Advertisement

NEW YORK -- To activists concerned about AIDS and prisoners' rights, it's an urgent, commonsense step that should already be nationwide policy - letting inmates have condoms to reduce the spread of sexually transmitted diseases behind bars.

Yet their efforts have run headlong into a stronger political force: Authorities' desire not to encourage inmates who flout prison rules against sex. Only one state, Vermont, and five cities regularly hand out condoms to inmates. Mississippi does so only for inmates receiving conjugal visits from their spouses.

Left out are the vast majority of America's 2.2 million prisoners - many held in facilities where sex between men is common and the risk of STDs is far higher than in the general population.

"I realize this is not a comfortable topic for many people, but it's one we simply cannot afford to ignore," said Rep. Barbara Lee, D-Calif. "When more than 90 percent of incarcerated people return to our communities, taking a head-in-the-sand approach to the fact that our prisons have become a breeding ground for HIV/AIDS poses a serious public health risk."

Despite such warnings, recent efforts to expand behind-bars condom access have gone almost nowhere. Prison officials contend that condoms can be used to conceal drugs, and law-and-order politicians scoff at what they depict as a step that would encourage both consensual and coercive sex.

"Removing the freedoms of criminals is in itself a deterrent," said California Assemblyman Paul Cook. "Allowing condoms into prisons simply sends the wrong message and confirms what we all suspect: Our prison system has serious and severe behavioral and inmate-control issues."

A measure introduced by Lee in Congress this year to allow condom access in federal prisons has made little headway. A bill in Illinois failed to clear a legislative committee in March. And a bill in California was vetoed last month by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, who said the proposal conflicted with prison regulations banning sexual activity.

Yet Ron Snyder, an HIV-positive Californian who served 19 months in the state's prison systems for embezzlement, said sex was widespread despite the rules. Some inmates used rubber gloves as makeshift condoms, and some supervisors allowed romantically involved men to share cells, he said.

Schwarzenegger, in his veto message, offered a ray of hope to advocates of condom access. He described it as "not an unreasonable public policy" and instructed corrections officials to assess the feasibility of a pilot program at a yet-to-be-selected state prison.

Snyder predicted a "tough struggle" to extend any such program systemwide because of staff attitudes. Many of the correctional officers are from rural areas, "and they assume men don't have sex with men," he said. "They just don't understand the picture."

California already is home to two of the local condom programs, at jails in Los Angeles and San Francisco. New York, Philadelphia and Washington, D.C., also have programs - New York's dates back to 1987.

In Los Angeles, the condoms are distributed by an activist group, the Center for Health Justice, only in a special unit reserved for gay men who ask to be assigned there. San Francisco, for nearly 20 years, has allowed prisoners to be issued condoms by the health staff; distribution was expanded in April in the form of a condom-dispensing machine placed in a jail recreation hall.

Mary Sylla, the Center for Health Justice's policy director, said there have been no security problems in either city.

"If there was a case of somebody doing something horrible with a condom, we would have heard about it - it would be all over the corrections community," she said. "But it doesn't happen."

Though disappointed by Schwarzenegger's veto, Sylla is hopeful that a pilot program will indeed get started in the state prison system. She said corrections officials already had visited the Los Angeles unit to see that local program in action.

But Sylla acknowledged that the cause is tough to promote.

"It's easy to make fun of," she said. "People don't like to think about prisoners having sex, even though everybody knows it goes on."

Vermont's Corrections Department, although it holds relatively few HIV-positive inmates, has been making condoms available in prisons since 1992 - even though sexual activity remains officially prohibited.

"It's a courageous position that Vermont took then and continues to have now," said the department's health services director, Dr. Dolores Burroughs-Biron.

Under the program, inmates are granted a single condom at a time if they request one from a nurse. Burroughs-Biron said there had been no reports of any security problems.

But corrections officials insist there are dangers. Glenn Goord, New York State's former corrections commissioner, told the Legislature that inmates use condoms to transport drugs within prison grounds. He also said condoms might embolden prison rapists, who could use them to avoid leaving DNA evidence after their assaults.

There is no authoritative U.S. data on the extent of HIV behind bars, but the federal Centers for Disease Control did conduct a detailed study in Georgia which found that 856 male inmates - about 2 percent of the state's total - were HIV-positive, and that 76 of them apparently got the virus while in prison.

The CDC report, published last year, suggested that lawmakers consider the condom policy.

Patrick Sullivan, the CDC epidemiologist who led the study, said sex among inmates was common in Georgia despite being prohibited. He said many of the sexually active inmates used condoms - or some improvised substitute - even though they were considered contraband.

In several foreign countries - including Canada, Australia and much of Western Europe - condoms have been freely distributed to prisoners for years without security problems.

Though activists are convinced condom access would reduce STD transmission, they are cautious in making specific health claims.

"I don't know how we'd ever be able to prove how much they reduce HIV," said Ron Snyder, who now works for the Center for Health Justice. "But if we could affect one or two people who wouldn't bring it back to their women when they get home, that's dramatic impact right there."

Video
Most commented stories
Browse online archives
Recent issues:
Reader comments on this story - 37 total

Note: All views and opinions expressed in reader comments are solely those of the individual submitting the comment, and not those of the Pantagraph or its staff.

to To: RE Its For The Kids wrote on Nov 20, 2007 9:34 PM:

" I really don't care if prisoners are having male-on-male consensual sex. That's a nonissue to me. I do care about money wasted on a preventable HIV epidemic. Likewise, I don't care if your kid is having sex. That's not my business. I am interested in preventing STDs and unwanted pregnancies since those things have a cost to society. Look at the bigger picture and don't worry so much about the rules. "

To: RE Its For The Kids wrote on Nov 20, 2007 6:14 PM:

" I think you miss the point. First off, this is not about inmate jailhouse rape. Nothing about it. It's about providing the tools and protection to safely engage in a prohibited activity in the jailhouse. It is contradictory. This will rightly be a winning argument to prevent the dissemination of condoms in prisons. This same argument, however, gets blasted when applied to our children. The fact you cannot rationalize this and label the poster (me) as a "fundie" indicates a serious charactor flaw. "

Understanding wrote on Nov 20, 2007 5:23 PM:

" I dont personaly see what the big deal is about giving inmates condoms. If it could help to stop or slow HIV infections inside and outside of prisons shouldnt it be supported? It doesnt matter if we think it is moral or not, all that should be important is how to keep a very deadly virus from infecting people. I cannot believe that some people would risk other's lives because of morality. "

C wrote on Nov 20, 2007 4:38 PM:

" Can you say, Smoke screen! "

Meg wrote on Nov 20, 2007 3:14 PM:

" Actually, it is an issue that (some) Pantagraph readers care about. All those men that are in prison right now? Many of them will be out and about in no time, and they'll go back to having sex with women, i.e. passing on whatever they contracted in prison. It is a public safety issue, so why do some people think it's "none of their business"? If you aren't interested, don't read the article. Easy solution. "

RE Its for the kids wrote on Nov 20, 2007 2:03 PM:

" This is pile of horse**** posted by an anti-sex fundie that is trying to compare prison rape with teenage sex. Way to go. I'll bet you think consensual gay sex is on the same level as murder. I love fundies because even at my stupidest, I can still say I'm smarter than them. "

Its for the kids wrote on Nov 20, 2007 1:37 PM:

" This article is insane. I agree, they are not supposed to be having sex and shouldn't be given condoms, which in turn encourages sex. This is such a common sensical view. The kicker is, however, this same philosophy is applied to our youths: we don't want them having sex, lets not give them condoms. This belief is disregarded and scorned upon. That's because certain peoples want our children having sex and see it as tactical assault on the moral fabric of our nation. "

Crybaby wrote on Nov 20, 2007 11:49 AM:

" There are many entertaining uses for a condom. They don't all have to involve sex, oh ye' with your minds in the gutter. (Or elsewhere) Here are a few. Put four on the bridge of your nose and run around the prison yard shouting "Gobble, Gobble". Put used ones in with your Lawyer's invoice. Make Ear and nose plugs. Put several together and make a "Stretch Man" toy. Fill with water and throw them at the Warden. Use them as automatic cell door closers. Put them on your fingers and play " Now, that didn't hurt. Did it?" Make finger puppets or Jello molds or water wings for non-swimmers. They also may serve as wonderful exercise bar grips in the prison weight yard. Finally, since the prisoners can't smoke, save the used ones and sell them as 'Chicklets' in the prison Commissary. "

Seriously wrote on Nov 20, 2007 11:47 AM:

" Come on Pantagraph! Seriously, this isn't really an issue that your readers care about. "

Question wrote on Nov 20, 2007 11:42 AM:

" If the person comes into the prision system with HIV why can't they have a unit for HIV people since it stated in the article that some prisons have a unit for gay men. Then there would be no spreading of HIV. "

To: A friend By Gov't Opressed Mule wrote on Nov 20, 2007 11:12 AM:

" HA HA HA HA HA HA!!! That was great, thank you. "

Mildred wrote on Nov 20, 2007 11:12 AM:

" I don't understand why those men would need condoms, it's not like there's any women in those places! Unless....oh my! Never mind! "

TO: Iagree wrote on Nov 20, 2007 11:10 AM:

" I also agree with you BUT what about the cases of "coercive" sex? I don't want to be wronfully imprisoned by this great facist state in which we live, only to be raped and given AIDS. "

Farmer Ted wrote on Nov 20, 2007 10:11 AM:

" There are plenty of guards, but they are lazy and most of the problem. If we spend $36k/year on each inmate, then they should certainly be safe, as the money isn't going to food/shelter, but rather overpaid and very lazy guards that don't have the gonads to do their jobs properly. "

to i don't understand why wrote on Nov 20, 2007 9:37 AM:

" why because it's your tax dollars at work ..... it may be someone you care about... never say never....save the goverment some money on healthcare and give them the condoms... you don't have to know who used them or how often "

Come on wrote on Nov 20, 2007 9:26 AM:

" you want to pay $.25 and give them a condom or millions of dollars in medical care after they develop HIV - There is no reason why inmates should not be allowed to be safe "

to If This Is Such An Issue wrote on Nov 20, 2007 6:42 AM:

" Actually, this seems to be out of the Mark Foley/Ted Haggardy/Larry Craig handbook to me! "

Nope wrote on Nov 20, 2007 6:41 AM:

" Not going to happen. That would mean acknowledging the prison rape problem. "

Man wearing a brown paper bag over head wrote on Nov 20, 2007 6:05 AM:

" Mississippi allows conjugal visits from their spouses. Interesting. "

hey farmer: wrote on Nov 20, 2007 5:31 AM:

" you should stick to the fields. OBviously you have never been inside a prison - not the local jail, I mean a prison. there are a handful of guards to watch hundreds of prisoners and they are low paid people. you should walk through the chambers of a state prison before making ignorant remarks. "

We can't get wrote on Nov 20, 2007 5:17 AM:

" teens and adults on the outside to take the time and have the concern to use condoms... and you expect Bubba to show enough care for the guys he vicitmizes behind bars to do so? I think your expectations are unrealistic. "

To Georges Buddy wrote on Nov 20, 2007 4:44 AM:

" of course it is a democratic issue because repuclicans believe in people who care to indulge in perverse activity to pay for it themselves. I think it is ridiculous to supply any homosexual with condoms, that merely gives a stamp of approval for deviant behavior. That is certainly a big democratic issue. "

A Friend wrote on Nov 19, 2007 9:20 PM:

" I wonder if George packed some Trojans? "

Farmer Ted wrote on Nov 19, 2007 9:08 PM:

" Why don't the guards do their jobs, watch them, and stop the illegal public activity competely. I seriously doubt that the infected will use them when they rape a non-violent offender. "

RE: "I don't understand why wrote on Nov 19, 2007 5:41 PM:" wrote on Nov 19, 2007 9:02 PM:

" You TOTALLY said it, buddy! "

hmmmm wrote on Nov 19, 2007 9:02 PM:

" Reported.....they are using peanut butter as a lubricant and getting yeast infections. What next? "

George's Buddy wrote on Nov 19, 2007 8:55 PM:

" How do you know its a Democratic Issue? Maybe your Senator from Idaho is worried about doing some time in the pokey, or your Rev. Haggard in Colorado, or maybe its become an issue since George Ryan became a number in the judicial system. Seriously, my guess is that you could buy a lot of condoms for the cost of treating AIDS in one patient. Let's not bury our heads in the sand just because its an uncomforable issue "

TO: Issue wrote on Nov 19, 2007 8:48 PM:

" Sell condoms in the commissary so that the public doesn't have to pay for them? When the state hands them out, they pay for themselves in cases of lifetime inmates. Think of what medical care costs for HIV+ inmates. Millions of dollars can be saved if handing out condoms helps prevent the spread of HIV. "

they wrote on Nov 19, 2007 8:46 PM:

" need to buy their own & the law needs to keep out the drugs "

Bubba Says wrote on Nov 19, 2007 7:50 PM:

" We don't need no condoms. Can't smoke afterwards anyway! Oop's I dropped the soap, can you get that for me?? "

If This Is Such An Issue wrote on Nov 19, 2007 7:33 PM:

" allow them to be sold on the commissaries. Why should taxpayers bare the burden of supplying prisoners with condoms to have same sex interludes? That is something right out of the Democratic Nancy Pelosi, Barney Frank playbook. If these repribates want to boogie with Bubba let them do so at their own risk and on thier own 75 cents. "

similar issues wrote on Nov 19, 2007 7:05 PM:

" This is the same type of behavior surrounding gun control. Banning firearms is the idea that the public would rather accept a woman raped and strangled with her own pantyhose in a slum alley before they'd allow her to defend herself with a handgun. Banning condoms because "inmates are forbidden from sex" while in prison doesn't accomplish anything when the rules are ignored. Buck up and face reality. "

Harv wrote on Nov 19, 2007 6:37 PM:

" WHO CARES! What a wonderful way to go death by aids but let em do it if thats their choice. I wouldn't spend a penny on them for protection. Rot City. "

Condoms for prisoners... wrote on Nov 19, 2007 6:16 PM:

" ...isn't love a beautiful thing? "

I agree with wrote on Nov 19, 2007 6:15 PM:

" "I don't understand why". Is this article meant to rally me to some imaginary cause? It's gonna take more than this to alert and wory me, Pantagraph! If this is your best shot today, looks like I'm gonna be going to bed tonight with nothing at all to be riled about. Aw, shucks! "

I agree~~ wrote on Nov 19, 2007 6:10 PM:

" but since the topic is open, I say call Rosie and her 5 step-sisters. End of any disease. Why don't they practice abstinence? This is a disgusting subject to hear or read about. Pantagraph, where in the hell did you get this from? Are you that desperate to fill a space? Find more interesting things than this. "

I don't understand why wrote on Nov 19, 2007 5:41 PM:

" this is something the public needs to know about. We don't get made aware of the yearly budgeted amounts for toilet tissue or medical supplies for prisons. We don't know how many bottles of Tums prisons go through, how much tooth paste, how mich Preparation H., how much powder for jock-itch, or medicne for nail fungus.. Why do we need to know about condoms? Consider it either a toiletry or medical expense and go with it! Condoms in all cirlces are a weirdly controversial topic and this news is meant for only ONE prupose- stirring the pot! It's NONE OF MY BUSINESS. "

Add your own comments

Please read the rules before posting comments.

You must be logged in to leave comments.
If you don't have a member ID, please register.

*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
  Forgot Your Password?