Pantagraph.com Weather forecast, local radar and more
NewsThursday, February 14, 2008 11:16 AM CST
Rebate checks in the mail by spring
Advertisement

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- The checks aren't in the mail, but they will be soon. President Bush signed legislation Wednesday to rush rebates ranging from $300 to $1,200 to millions of people, the centerpiece of government efforts to brace the wobbly economy. First, though, you must file your 2007 tax return.

More than 130 million people are expected to get the rebates, starting around May. Congress, Bush, the Federal Reserve and Wall Street are hoping the money will burn such a hole in people's pockets that they won't be able to resist spending it. And the spending is supposed to give an energizing jolt to a national economy that is in danger of toppling into a recession if it hasn't already.

Whether people actually spend the money remains to be seen. A recent Associated Press-Ipos poll indicates most people have other plans. Forty-five percent said they planned to pay off bills, while 32 percent said they would save or invest it. Only 19 percent said they would spend their rebates.

The measure Bush signed - a $168 billion rescue package passed with lightning speed by Congress last week - includes not only rebates for individuals but also tax breaks for businesses to spur investment in new plants and equipment. That, too, would help bolster U.S. economic activity. The package also contains provisions aimed at helping struggling homeowners clobbered by the housing collapse and the credit crunch refinance into more affordable mortgages.

The emergency plan marked a rare moment of cooperation among political rivals fearful that an ailing economy during an election year would invite voter retaliation.

Bush, who called the measure "a booster shot for our economy," praised the bipartisan cooperation. "We have come together on a single mission - and that is to put the people's interests first," he said.

Who gets a rebate? Most people who pay taxes or earn at least $3,000, including through Social Security or veterans' disability benefits. Singles making more than $75,000 and couples with income topping $150,000, however, will get smaller checks, up to the top limits for any rebate: incomes of $87,000 for individuals and $174,000 for couples.

To get any rebate, you must file a 2007 tax return and have a valid Social Security number. If you already filed your 2007 return, the IRS says you don't need to do anything extra.

Most taxpayers will receive a check of up to $600 for individuals and $1,200 for couples, with an additional $300 for each child.

People earning too little to pay taxes but at least $3,000 - including elderly people whose only income is from Social Security and veterans who live on disability payments - will get $300 if single, or $600 if a couple.

The IRS will send out rebates - by mail or by direct deposit into your bank account - through the late spring and the summer. The rebates come in addition to any regular tax refund.

To pay for the rebates - which are estimated to cost about $117 billion over the next two years - the government will have to borrow more money, enlarging the budget deficit.

The Bush administration and some private economists are hopeful the rebates, tax breaks and aggressive interest rate reductions by the Federal Reserve will help the country narrowly dodge a recession. An increasing number of economists, however, believe the country has already fallen into its first recession since 2001, and they are simply hopeful the rescue package will limit the damage. Most people - 61 percent - say the economy is now in a recession, according to the AP-Ipsos poll.

"I do think this will give the economy a shot of adrenaline," said Stuart Hoffman, chief economist at PNC Financial Services Group.

The National Bureau of Economic Research, a private research organization, looked at what people did with their 2001 rebates. The study found that "households spent about 20 to 40 percent of their rebates on nondurable goods" - which can include things like food and clothing - in the first three months. They spent roughly another third in the following three months.

With the current stimulus, the economy will log growth in the range of 2.25 percent to 2.50 percent in the second half of this year - roughly one full percentage point higher than without the bracing tonic, Hoffman estimated. That would be closer to a more normal rate of around 3 percent, he said.

That in turn should encourage businesses to step up hiring. Nervous employers cut 17,000 jobs in January, the first nationwide loss of jobs in more than four years.

Edward Lazear, chairman of the White House Council of Economic Advisers, predicted, "The stimulus will have the effect of increasing jobs by about half a million above the number that would have been the case in the absence of that."

Still, even with the rescue efforts, some analysts fear the economy could backslide and flirt with recession again in 2009.

To help the severely depressed housing market, the stimulus package would raise temporarily to $729,750 the limit on Federal Housing Administration loans and also raise the cap on loans that mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac can buy.

Raising those limits, should provide relief in the market for "jumbo" mortgages - those exceeding $417,000. The credit crunch hit that market hard, making it very difficult, if not impossible, for people to get those loans. That has plunged the housing market even deeper into turmoil.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of California said the provisions will provide "families a second chance at the American dream of homeownership by helping them refinance their mortgages and avoid foreclosure."

Video
Most commented stories
Browse online archives
Recent issues:
Reader comments on this story - 48 total

Note: All views and opinions expressed in reader comments are solely those of the individual submitting the comment, and not those of the Pantagraph or its staff.

To Ed wrote on Feb 14, 2008 6:45 PM:

" Why is it so hard to get through to you and your cronies that there is such a thing as underemployment? You seem to think that getting a job will solve everything. Not all the jobs available are of State Farm standard - most available jobs are minimum wage. Throw in a need for childcare and BAM! There goes your paycheck!

"Working Poor" is what they call it. I prefer to call people like us "underemployed".

Oh, it must be so nice not to want for anything! "

to Anchor wrote on Feb 14, 2008 3:33 PM:

" That might make sense except flat panels are $199 at Wal-Mart and tube TVs are hard to find and not really any cheaper. Flat panel TVs and cell phones are only luxuries to people who are old enough to have graduated high school in the 1950s. "

to Future sucky presidents wrote on Feb 14, 2008 2:23 PM:

" Like things are going so great now. Must be nice to be a State Farm lifer and be insulated from economic effects. "

to I dont understand wrote on Feb 14, 2008 2:22 PM:

" God forbid that some of us want the Government to actually try to solve problems rather than simply putting on a bandaid. "

Anchor wrote on Feb 14, 2008 2:14 PM:

" I am going to be sure to yell at Bush the next time I see him on my Brand New Flat-Panel TV. "

I dont understand wrote on Feb 14, 2008 1:24 PM:

" People are upset because they might lose their house due to a lack of money. People are upset because they will be getting money. It's like no matter what the government does, they can't do right. Perhaps you would find life more fulfilling in Iran. "

Future sucky presidents wrote on Feb 14, 2008 1:18 PM:

" I can't wait till all you BUSH haters see what the next president is gonna do? Cause you to fall right on your ***. HAH! Are you in for a treat or what? "

GW wrote on Feb 14, 2008 11:53 AM:

" I'm not too good with my mathematicals. Can someone explain where the government is going to get this money from if it is already so deep in debt? I heard it was called Bushenomics . . . cut income (taxes) and spend more, but I'm having a hard time figuring out how that can be a good thing. "

Dave wrote on Feb 14, 2008 11:27 AM:

" I posted this in a previous article and it might help here too. This is what changed with this tax rebate.

This bill creates new tax credits for 2008. Then it mails out checks for the same amount now. When you do your taxes for 2008 (in early 2009), you will owe less taxes because of these new tax credits. However, you will already have your money so it will not change your refund at all.

For example, a single person would get a $600 check about May. Then next April, they will figure out their 2008 taxes. There will be a $600 credit to the taxes they owe but there will also be $600 listed as taxes they have already had refunded. So the net result in April 2009 will be zero. The new part is that if the rebate overpays anything, you get to keep it. And if you fail to get a rebate in 2008 but qualify in 2009, you still get it and your refund will grow. The tax changes are for tax year 2008. " "

to whatever wrote on Feb 14, 2008 11:17 AM:

" If the government really cared, they'd do something about gas prices. Gas prices are responsible for the price of everything going up. Despite Republican "logic", we still use gas to transport most of our goods and services. Its not like the transport companies are going to just absorb the increased cost of fuel. If gas costed less, there'd be more money for everything else. "

to wait... wrote on Feb 14, 2008 11:15 AM:

" Actually, the Chinese are paying for it. We have a huge credit card debt to them. "

whatever wrote on Feb 14, 2008 10:35 AM:

" This " stimulus plan" is a joke. The only people who are going to benefit from this plan are those who already have money. We need to get it together. In B/N alone have you noticed the number of vacant houses we have. How can we have vacant homes and then have 5 member familys packed into 2 bedroom apts. If the government really wants to help allocate money for people to buy homes. That way they build financial security and will be able to afford to spend money into the economy. We can't keep thinking about 2 years down the road, if we think 5 to 10 years down the road we might be in a better position. "

wait... wrote on Feb 14, 2008 10:26 AM:

" who is paying for this? Oh yeah we are. So we're basically lenduing ourselves money that we'll have to pay off? Wow, thanks for the loan "

i just wrote on Feb 14, 2008 10:21 AM:

" don`t understand the whole debt thing. who are we in debt to? "

I say wrote on Feb 14, 2008 10:20 AM:

" I didn't ask for the rebate but I will happily take it. I can put that towards my schooling next semester. Small price to pay but it will get me out of this rut of working low paying jobs. Raising that minimum wage was a dumb thing to do. It just bumped up the cost of everything else. "

hurry up... wrote on Feb 14, 2008 10:19 AM:

" and send me my check for...$2700 I could really use the money!! Yeah a shopping I will go! "

B Wilson wrote on Feb 14, 2008 10:00 AM:

" Crazy things is that folks who don't even pay income tax are getting checks and there are seniors who are wanting a rebate even when they didn't even pay taxes and are living on social security. What other entitlements do you want? I think this whole thing is crazy! IF they pulled the spending from another source in order to send our rebate OK, but this is just adding further to our debt. Bad deal for our children. "

Ed wrote on Feb 14, 2008 9:36 AM:

" All you people do is complain about the goverment not giving you enought.Who the hell says the goverment needs to give you anything.If the goverment would stop giving to you and make you work you may feel better about your selves.I know I would "

To adsf wrote on Feb 14, 2008 9:28 AM:

" I believe scam is correct. I have read a few articles regarding the "rebate" and it sounds to me like you will have to deduct the "rebate" amount received this year off of your 2008 tax refund. Therefore, it is basically an advance on your 2008 refund. However, if your 2008 refund amount is lesser than the rebate amount you don't have to pay anything back.

If this is the case, I feel the government needs to make this fact known to the public so this doesn't take people by surprise next year.

Is there a CPA or someone out there reading the blogs that can clarify? "

i dont want..... wrote on Feb 14, 2008 9:27 AM:

" it. i'd rather it not be taken out of next year. i know some people who only recieved 300 back this year.... for people like them that will have to pay 300 back next year thanks to this will cause more debt dont you think? it's just a cover up to make him seem like he's doing something "

Is No one happy wrote on Feb 14, 2008 9:16 AM:

" NEGATIVE NEGATIVE NEGATIVE...Try thinking positive thoughts! Exactly why I don't live and NEVER will live in B/N...most B/N residents are the most negative, thoughtless, complaining people I have ever run across. A little positive attitude GOES a LONG LONG way!!! Try it....~~ A happy, but flooded, Pontiac Neighbor! "

To: adsf wrote on Feb 14, 2008 9:12 AM:

" Yes we will. Remember 2001? We got money back from the President because we had a surplus budget and ended up having to report the money as other income on that year's taxes. You will be doing the same when you start filing taxes next year. "

waldo wrote on Feb 14, 2008 8:58 AM:

" this is nothing but a bandage to slow the bleeding. if they really want to help put a freeze on electric, gasoline, and grocery prices. "

broke wrote on Feb 14, 2008 8:52 AM:

" not even a drop in the bucket I'm afraid "

It's nice but . . . wrote on Feb 14, 2008 8:31 AM:

" I owe over $2000 in federal taxes this year. It would be nice if they'd just keep the rebate and apply it to what I owe. Save everyone some hassle and postage. But I know it won't work that way. Oh well, whadda ya do?

"

Almost enough wrote on Feb 14, 2008 8:27 AM:

" This rebate plus my income tax refund is almost enough to pay what I will owe to Unit 5's portion of my taxes this year. I retire in two years and will be moving shortly thereafter. My retirement home has more square footage and has more acerage than my present home but the taxes are about half! "

To:ME wrote on Feb 14, 2008 8:19 AM:

" Yes you should go ahead and file a return this year even if you don't have too. That is how they will determine if you will recieve a rebate check. "

City Taxes wrote on Feb 14, 2008 8:14 AM:

" Since we now have higher taxes in bloomington and normal, just make my check out to the city. There goes my big screen!! "

those wrote on Feb 14, 2008 8:12 AM:

" who are disabled and don't have any income except for ss does not need apply. these people don't get ahead. they just keep going downhill because of inflation. this money they are giving away will be added to the deficit. great. just what we need. don't expect the government to bail you out of your problems. plan ahead. and i mean way ahead. if you can save it. do it. if you can afford to plan for your future without the government, do it. don't depend on the government to do anything for you because what they offer is to keep you down and living on the entitlement programs where you will never get out. you will never get ahead. "

Dave wrote on Feb 14, 2008 8:10 AM:

" I we thought like the government, the way we would stimulate our own personal ecoonomy is go out and borrow to our limits then spend it.
Why didn't they just give the working middle class a big tax break? I know if my wife and I had extra money every month we would probably be more inclined to spend more.
If we spent more, the government would collect more taxes because we would increase the income of others and as others income increased there would be a domino affect. "

blau wrote on Feb 14, 2008 8:02 AM:

" All this will do is help to make rich greedy corporations like Walmart and Disney World even richer!!!!! "

Hmmmmmm wrote on Feb 14, 2008 7:37 AM:

" More table scraps while his buddies are making billions in Iraq. Thanks W for putting us farther in debt for this pittance we have to have pay back with interest. "

TV wrote on Feb 14, 2008 7:32 AM:

" I'm going to buy a big screen plasma TV. always wanted one. so for all my years of paying taxes, now they are finally going to give me something i want. yahoo. spend spend spend "

To Bills wrote on Feb 14, 2008 7:14 AM:

" It doesn't matter if you pay your bills with the upcoming rebate. Someone else will eventually get ahold of your money and spend it for themselves. The Pantagraph's false portrayal of the rebates not working based on polls (which once again I was never polled) is beyond my understanding of true journalism. So here is my answer to the my rebate - I am remodeling my home and plan to use the rebate check towards that. Polls are erroneous and people should realize the money WILL be spent regardless in one is paying bills or not. "

adsf wrote on Feb 14, 2008 7:05 AM:

" Are you people not reading the news article? This is a rebate check. We will not be paying this back on next years taxes. "

scam wrote on Feb 14, 2008 5:11 AM:

" this is just an advance on next years tax return. Last time this happened we didn't realize it and spent the money, but then when we did our taxes the following year we didn't get much back because they took that off the top. We use our tax return to pay our property taxes so it hurt us the following year. if we get it this year it will just go in the bank and earn interest for the year until we need it next year. "

seesr wrote on Feb 14, 2008 3:22 AM:

" If you don't need this rebate, please forward it to the Dome. "

Me wrote on Feb 14, 2008 2:19 AM:

" What about us on Sociol Security that dont have to file a income tax return. I received $7,980 last year. I could really use that $300. Should I go ahead and file anyway? Anyone know? Thanks "

Thank You wrote on Feb 13, 2008 9:27 PM:

" Thanks for the $1800 you will be sending it will be much needed. "

Bills wrote on Feb 13, 2008 8:43 PM:

" My check will go toward reducing debt. No economy stimulating from me, sorry. If I'm going to have to give it all back next year, I'd rather not have it anyway. It will likely put more people in a pickle in 2009 when they go to file their 2008 taxes. The country is in a recession - a $300-1,200 check per person isn't going to change things. "

Titanic wrote on Feb 13, 2008 8:12 PM:

" Here's your bucket, lets see if we can stop the sinking. "

To: Thank you Mr Bush wrote on Feb 13, 2008 8:08 PM:

" So you selected an insurance package with a high deductible? I fail to see the connection between your personal insurance decision and the stimulus package. How is it all Bush's fault, you most likely had a choice in insurance plans. "

ern wrote on Feb 13, 2008 7:32 PM:

" are we going to have to pay a gift tax on it....there has to be some kind of catch to it "

help us all wrote on Feb 13, 2008 6:51 PM:

" A little too little and too late. We are in recession admit it! "

To Thank You Mr Bush wrote on Feb 13, 2008 6:43 PM:

" Why do you expect the govt to buy your med's? Do you really think your neighbor should split your bills with you? This rebate thing is just a cheap political ploy for the upcoming election. All its doing is causing people like yourself to believe its your right for the govt to provide for you. "

no wrote on Feb 13, 2008 6:29 PM:

" its called money laundering...oh believe me its being givin to you but you will have to pay it back ..... I dont really want it at all ...I seen how the last laundering went stick it in your pooper you old coot i dont want any of your so called hand outs .... "

Thank You Mr. Bush wrote on Feb 13, 2008 6:11 PM:

" for the money, but I have a medical co-pay of 275.00l I have other med's that the insurance won't pay for. So the only thing I'm buying is med's. So, tell me how that helps the rest of the USA.???? "

cool wrote on Feb 13, 2008 5:55 PM:

" Sounds like a good plan to me.........hard to believe that it came from Bush's Camp. "

Add your own comments

Please read the rules before posting comments.

You must be logged in to leave comments.
If you don't have a member ID, please register.

*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
  Forgot Your Password?