Pantagraph.com Weather forecast, local radar and more
NewsWednesday, February 20, 2008 6:04 PM CST
Military uses 'glow in the dark' cloth to ID friendly forces
Advertisement

DAYTON, Ohio -- When Taliban forces attacked a police checkpoint in central Afghanistan under dark of night in late 2006, special-operations Master Sgt. Andrew Martin called in air support and then slapped a high-tech cloth-like device on his helmet for protection.

Fresh from labs at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, the device transmitted light from a powerful light-emitting diode, or LED, that pulsed through a fiber optic bundle, giving off infrared signals visible to pilots wearing night-vision goggles.

“The pilots were able to very quickly pick it up,” recalled Martin, who has since retired from the Air Force. “What didn’t happen was additional questions from the pilots asking me my location.”

The new technology — called Target Recognition Operator Notification system — was designed to easily identify friendly forces and avoid casualties from friendly fire.

Martin liked the equipment so much he used it on about 35 missions over six months. He said it is better than strobe lights, which can be mistaken for machine-gun fire, or reflective tape, which is difficult to see from the air.

“U.S. forces have been dogged by the difficulty of finding each other in the fog of battle,” said Loren Thompson, a defense analyst with the Lexington Institute in Arlington, Va. “What this new innovation allows is easy identification of friendly forces without helping the enemy do the same thing.”

Brian Hunt, an engineer with the Air Force Research Lab, said he and his team were approached in 2004 and asked to develop such a system. Working with Lumitex Inc. of Strongsville, the effort was part of a rapid-reaction program where researchers were given up to $100,000 and one year to come up with a product.

“A lot of different units saw the need for something like this, to be able to clearly determine friend or foe,” Hunt said.

The group produced 108 prototypes in six months. Each unit costs about $100.

Built in to the nylon-like cloth is a circuit board and a battery pack. The woven nature of the cloth emits light in a controlled way, creating a uniform surface.

The system can run 200 hours on two double-A batteries and weighs less than three ounces. It can be worn on tactical vests, around an arm or mounted to a helmet.

“You can put it anywhere,” Hunt said. “It’s got Velcro on the back. It sticks to everything.”

The circuitry also allows the system to flash at different speeds. That enables pilots to identify different groups of friendly forces and see which group is under attack, which group is trying to circle the enemy, and who the reinforcements are, among other things.

Mike Sedillo, support contractor at the research lab, said he would like to see the system in the hands of all U.S. forces in the battlefield and become standard equipment in air-crew survival kits.

Sedillo said researchers are working to upgrade the system so it will transmit light in other parts of the spectrum, making it more difficult for enemy forces to detect with conventional night vision technology.

“Friendly fire incidents in general are declining, but in counterinsurgency or counter-terror warfare it’s much harder to sort out our people from the other side because there are no front lines,” Thompson said. “This invention is well-suited to a world in which all the old features of battlefield like secure areas and front lines are missing.”

Take a look
Second Lt. Brian Hunt holds up a TRON device (Target Recognition Operator Notification), a fiber optic panel that can be seen with night vision at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base in Dayton, Ohio, on Jan. 29. The device is designed to easily identify friendly forces and avoid casualties from friendly fire. (AP Photo/Skip Peterson)
Video
Most commented stories
Browse online archives
Recent issues:
Reader comments on this story - 6 total

Note: All views and opinions expressed in reader comments are solely those of the individual submitting the comment, and not those of the Pantagraph or its staff.

Paladin wrote on Feb 20, 2008 9:09 AM:

" ...you can turn this off, unlike glint tape (or those neon orange panels we used on our camoflaged vehicles). Also, unlike glint tape, this can break, and fail to work. Oh, well, until we can improve real time commo (TRADOC's perennial "lesson learned"), I guess this will make someone rich. "

8up wrote on Feb 20, 2008 8:50 AM:

" Are we winning yet ? "

former Army soldier wrote on Feb 20, 2008 8:43 AM:

" How is this different than the glint tape we used back in the Gulf war? "

!! wrote on Feb 20, 2008 8:30 AM:

" It is not the problem of the press publishing this info. The thing wrong here is the industry and the DOD have let the press know about it. As for security of this country sometimes you would think the worst leaker of info is the DOD. "

Great idea, but... wrote on Feb 20, 2008 7:52 AM:

" I'm sure this story is going to draw dozens of similar comments- how long do you suppose it will be before our high-tech enemy over there comes up with something very similar to this multi-million dollar innovation... and probably costing them a LOT LESS? By the way, couldn't the media wait a few months before publishing this information so the whole world knows about it? "

Umm wrote on Feb 20, 2008 7:32 AM:

" Why are we reporting this? Isnt this like telling the enemy what we are doing and they will just do the same thing to themselves? "

Add your own comments

Please read the rules before posting comments.

You must be logged in to leave comments.
If you don't have a member ID, please register.

*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
  Forgot Your Password?