Pantagraph.com Weather forecast, local radar and more
NewsSaturday, April 5, 2008 7:01 PM CDT
Comments Comments (5) | E-mail this page E-mail this page | Print this page Print this page | Enlarge type Enlarge type | Reduce type Reduce type | Search archives Search archives | RSS RSS feeds | Add to My Yahoo! Add to My Yahoo!
Some argue we are built to coo at sight of a baby
By Robert Lee Hotz
The Wall Street Journal
Advertisement

We are drawn to a baby face, whether or not we claim to like children. Our brain can’t help itself. Our neurons reflexively respond to an infant’s big eyes, broad forehead, button nose and tiny chin, University of Oxford researchers recently reported in the online journal PLoS One.

Using a technique called magneto-encephalography that measures brain signals, the Oxford researchers found that a baby’s face can seize our attention in milliseconds, activating an unusual mental organ called the fusiform gyrus that responds to human faces. Moreover, these distinctive infant features, unlike the mature features of an adult, trigger a sense of reward and good feeling in a seventh of a second. Picture Bambi’s saucer-size eyes or those of Mickey Mouse.

The researchers concluded that the parental instinct is present in all of us. “It suggests we are probably all hard-wired to respond and care for babies, to help us perpetuate the species,” said Oxford child psychiatrist Alan Stein, who helped conduct the experiment. “The response to an infant face is too fast to be under conscious control.”

If so, where did brain cells and synapses learn anything about a face? The question goes deeper than surface appearances. Our ability to distinguish faces deftly is central to a debate about the anatomy of knowledge.

“Why do we have special regions of the brain for some higher-level abilities but not for others?” asked neuroscientist Nancy Kanwisher, who studies visual perception and cognition at MIT’s McGovern Institute for Brain Research. “Are they innate? Are they learned?”

Many scientists, in fact, remain convinced that the brain’s intimate knowledge of faces is a byproduct of its ability to capture the visual essence of any object. “You can show that parts of the brain most selective for faces are also responsive to cars in a car expert and birds in a bird expert,” said psychologist Isabel Gauthier at Vanderbilt University.

So far, researchers have found four clusters of expert brain cells. One responds to faces; another just to places; a third to body parts, such as feet, knees, elbows and hands. There also is brain tissue devoted just to the visual appearance of written words — and that intrigues researchers on both sides of the debate, because humanity hasn’t been reading or writing long enough for evolution to lend a hand. “Letters and words could not be innate,” Gauthier said.

That suggests something fundamental about the flexibility of the mind. Nature and nurture work together to shape our perceptions.

To our eyes, every face is a unique volume in the library of human nature. We read its language of expressions at a glance, fluently translating a curled lip, raised eyebrow or averted gaze. “There are billions of faces in the world, and we can recognize them all and tell them all apart,” said UCLA neuropsychologist Susan Bookheimer.

On average, the brain takes only 200 milliseconds to tell one face from another, responding swiftly and selectively to cues of gender, ethnicity and identity, University of Southern California scientists reported recently in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

So attuned are we to the pattern of eyes, nose and mouth that we can see faces where none exist: in cloud banks or rock formations on Mars, and even in the shape of a cinnamon bun said to resemble Mother Teresa. When that neural ability falters, as in autism, we can find friendly faces threatening. In a rare disorder called prosopagnosia, we can’t recognize faces at all.

Through brain-scanning experiments, researchers have located the neurochemical essence of our face expertise in a strip of temporal-lobe tissue about two inches long and three-quarters of an inch wide. Studying this face recognition area in macaque monkeys, neurobiologist Doris Tsao at the University of Bremen, Germany, reported in Science that the tissue consisted almost entirely of neurons that responded just to faces.

To understand how the tissue develops, Yoichi Sugita at Japan’s Neuroscience Research Institute raised infant monkeys for two years without ever showing them a face. Lab workers wore hoods. When faces were finally revealed to them, the monkeys could readily tell them apart, Dr. Sugita reported in January in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

“It is mind-blowing,” Kanwisher said. “If you had to bet, you would bet it is innate.”

Take a look
Oxford researchers found that a baby’s face, like New Year's baby Janae Walder's above, can seize our attention in milliseconds, activating an unusual mental organ called the fusiform gyrus that responds to human faces. (The Pantagraph/STEVE SMEDLEY)
Video
Most commented stories
Browse online archives
Recent issues:
Reader comments on this story - 5 total

Note: All views and opinions expressed in reader comments are solely those of the individual submitting the comment, and not those of the Pantagraph or its staff.

JMK wrote on Apr 6, 2008 6:19 AM:

" I totally agree with you editorgirl62! I think we should look into why humans feel the need to analyze everything. You in? "

editorgirl62 wrote on Apr 5, 2008 8:57 PM:

" Geez! Why does everything we humans feel have to be analyzed to the nth degree? How much money was sent on THIS study, while kids right here in America were hungry? The reason we're attracted to babies is simple - we are attracted strongly to their innocence, because it's the only place in the world to find it. We are attracted to them because they don't know hate, or prejudice - they are pure, and in babies is the only place we can find that. We're attracted and drawn to them because we, well, most of us anyway, have the deep instinct to protect that which is smaller and weaker than us. We are drawn to them because we know they are our future....
Wow! I didn't even have to do a study!! But if the government wants to pay us who comment for our own findings, we're happy to submit our addresses so they can send the checks! "

Dalmanites wrote on Apr 5, 2008 8:06 PM:

" This is old news. I heard this research 25 years ago. "

Zeva wrote on Apr 5, 2008 5:21 PM:

" Sorry, but my daughter says she could care less about babies and only says nice things to the parents because that is what they want to hear. She should know, she let 2 of them go because she didn't want to be bothered with them. Not everyone is programed to like babies and she is living proof. For some reason she is unlike anyone else in our family. We all love babies and can't help making over them. No, I didn't drop her on her head, ok. "

The Irascible Fachna wrote on Apr 5, 2008 2:41 PM:

" And, extending the protective instinct along the developmental scale, it's said that we like penguins because they remind us of toddlers. "
Add your own comments

Please read the rules before posting comments.

You must be logged in to leave comments.
If you don't have a member ID, please register.

*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
  Forgot Your Password?
 
Lee Enterprises Customer Service | 301 W. Washington St., PO Box 2907, Bloomington, IL 61701-2907 | Ph. 309-829-9000 | 800-747-7323
Copyright © 2008, Pantagraph Publishing Co. and Lee Enterprises. All rights reserved. | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy