Pantagraph.com Weather forecast, local radar and more
Pantagraph EditorialMonday, May 12, 2008 12:26 AM CDT
Not just 'filthy rich' who object to lawmakers' pay hike
Advertisement

Senate President Emil Jones and Sen. Rickey Hendon might have been directing their caustic remarks at Sen. Susan Garrett for opposing a legislative pay increase.

But their comments were also insulting to taxpayers - particularly those struggling to make ends meet while their elected representatives are poised to receive their second double-digit percentage pay increase in two years.

All three are Democrats.

Hendon called Garrett of suburban Lake Forest the senator from "Richville."

He also said, "It just blows my mind how the filthy rich are always the ones saying we don't need the raise."

It's not just "the filthy rich" who are saying that, Sen. Hendon. Those opposing the 11.7 percent increase include taxpayers who make far less than the Legislature's base pay of $65,353 - along with a $125 per diem to cover their expenses each day they are in session.

Then there's Jones who quipped, "I've got to get me some food stamps," while walking near Garrett after the heated discussion on pay increases.

On top of his base pay, Jones receives an additional $26,471 for serving as Senate president. In other words, even without the raise, his salary is approaching six figures.

For Jones to joke that he needs food stamps without the raise shows arrogance and callousness toward people in his Chicago district and elsewhere in Illinois who need food stamps to feed their families and meet their basic needs.

Furthermore, most lawmakers will receive pensions their constituents can only dream of.

Although Jones and Hendon are full-time lawmakers, many of their colleagues have other jobs that supplement their pay.

While no one gets "rich" working strictly as a state lawmaker in Illinois, no one is heading to the poorhouse on those salaries.

The House voted 94-8 on Wednesday to reject the pay increases recommended by the Illinois Compensation Review Board. However, both chambers must vote to reject the increases in the same resolution in order to block them - and its questionable whether the matter will even come to a vote in the Senate, at least not with a "clean" bill.

Hendon is suggesting a different version that would muddy the political waters by barring any lawmaker who voted against a pay increase from receiving it if the pay increase eventually takes effect. That's ludicrous.

If the Senate approves Hendon's proposal or some different bill on which the House doesn't act, the raises will take effect and taxpayers will be left holding the bag - again.

Video stories
Most commented stories
Community calendar
Browse online archives
Recent issues:
Reader comments on this story - 7 total

Note: All views and opinions expressed in reader comments are solely those of the individual submitting the comment, and not those of the Pantagraph or its staff.

crimson wrote on May 12, 2008 8:51 PM:

" Dear Illinois republican party,

Please put forth candidates that aren't trolls so I can vote these jerks out of office.
I'm getting by on substantially less than 70k a year. They can too. I'm a democrat and aside from Madigan, these jerks don't represent me. It's like they're all little Dubya's, Cheney's and Delay's, evil and without souls.

So please, Republicans, put up credible, humane, opponents. Give me a reason to vote in Illinois elections.

Sincerely,
Crimson "

Jarhead71 wrote on May 12, 2008 6:20 PM:

" They failed to block their own pay raise LAST YEAR, not a few years ago. Emil Jones needs to go. He has outlived his usefulness in the Senate, except to himself, his banker and his boss, Mayor Daley. He will not bring the raises to a vote, therefore ever Legislator will get it. Then, there is NO INCENTIVE to pass anything meaningful before the session is due to come to a close, so they will extend the session and get paid above their non-voted pay raise for each and everyday that they say that they are in session, even if it is only an hour or two. What a bunch of useless criminals we have in the General Assembly. "

brsc wrote on May 12, 2008 5:03 PM:

" Public servants need to look at their elected position as serving their electorate, not as a vocation. Many of the state and federal salaries are already way too high and there are those making a career out of "public service." The founders never intended that to happen. Serve your community and then go home and get a real job! Emil Jones comment was pathetic. What a class envy statement. Go home Emil and get a real job and earn all the money you feel you need, but don't take the hard earned money from the tax payers of this state! "

isunormalil wrote on May 12, 2008 1:13 PM:

" PS-vote i november. Against every incumbent. Who cares if they are democrats or republicans. These people act like it's just their money they are spending. "

isunormalil wrote on May 12, 2008 1:11 PM:

" Didn't they get a pay raise a few years ago? Hasn't Emil got enough money from Ameren? I am against this pay increase because they aren't deserving. Get a real job. "

FYI wrote on May 12, 2008 10:31 AM:

" 2-3% like the rest of us is reasonable, but I would kill to have that kind of salary. That's almost as much and my wife and I combined. I guarantee we work harder and longer for it too AND we get our jobs done....they still haven't made last years budget and another year is almost gone by. "

keep-sarcasm-alive wrote on May 12, 2008 1:06 AM:

" I would not begrudge them a pay raise if our state was in a better financial position, and maybe not even in its present financial crunch if they were asking for a reasonable amount...but does it have to be 11.7%?! That's outrageous! "

Add your own comments

Please read the rules before posting comments.

You must be logged in to leave comments.
If you don't have a member ID, please register.

*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
  Forgot Your Password?