Pantagraph.com Weather forecast, local radar and more
NewsTuesday, May 13, 2008 4:31 PM CDT
Livingston County hearing heeds public's comments on wind farms
Advertisement

PONTIAC -- Public comment for or against a proposed 155-turbine wind farm in Livingston County continued at a Livingston County Zoning Board of Appeals hearing Monday night.

Opponents argued the wind farm would endanger public health and the environment and damage property values. Those in favor of the development said it was a “win-win” situation because various taxing bodies would benefit from the property taxes, and they saw no problems with an existing wind farm in McLean County.

“I’ve been trying to keep informed on wind farms for three years … and the more I learn about this industry the more complicated it seems to get,” said Livingston County Board Member-elect Judy Campbell of Manville, who opposes the wind farm.

Iberdrola Renewables, which recently acquired wind farm developer PPM Energy, is seeking a permit to develop the 155-turbine Streator-Cayuga Ridge South Wind Farm. It would use sites scattered across 15,000 acres east of Interstate 55 and between the communities of Odell and Emington.

Livingston County Board member Carolyn Gerwin, who said she was speaking as a private citizen, said she did not want to see anybody “thrown under the bus.” For example, she claimed wind turbines would hurt economic development and property owners’ rights because setbacks from turbines would limit where buildings could be built in the future.

“I believe that it is the responsibility of the Zoning Board of Appeals to protect the interest of the people of Livingston County, and that means all of the people of Livingston County,” she said.

Gerald Miller of Bloomington, who has family members who own property in the area, said they had mixed feelings about the project from the start and continue to have these mixed feelings.

“Our property will be completely surrounded by them, and we don’t live there now but plan to retire there,” he said. “We believe that the value of our residential property will be negatively impacted.”

Parker Bane of Pontiac said he grew up in Arrowsmith, and that community has had no adverse affects since the development of the nearby Twin Grove Wind Farm.

Michael Gall, 17, of Odell said he has visited the Twin Grove Wind Farm over a dozen times and saw how the county could be improved with the addition of the turbines.

“I plan to stay here and work in this county that I love,” he said. “This county is a part of me and I am a part of it. If you will not do this for your generation, then do it for mine.”

The hearing continues at 7 p.m. today at Pontiac Township High School. That will be the last day for collecting testimony on the proposal.

Video
Most commented stories
Browse online archives
Recent issues:
Reader comments on this story - 2 total

Note: All views and opinions expressed in reader comments are solely those of the individual submitting the comment, and not those of the Pantagraph or its staff.

My Two Cents wrote on May 14, 2008 12:38 PM:

" You don't hear turbines in high wind. The developers count on the masking effect of the wind to cover the noise. They test their turbines in higher winds because the violations and sleep disruptions during low wind events. Certain low frequency noises cause organs in the body to vibrate, creating a host of health problems. People who pull off the road to listen are comparing apples and oranges - were you there 2 minutes or 24 hours a day, seven days a week, FOREVER - being subjected to the onslaught of noise for the rest of your lives when forced to live among these 400 foot tall industrial power plants dumped in the middle of quiet agricultural communities? Did you experience the stacking wave effects of multiple turbines operating simultaneously? Do you have any idea of what you're talking about - other than being a spokeperson to spread the company's misinformation on the violations likely to occur. Have you read the transcript of the zoning hearings where testimony is given by wind company experts about the violations which they testify will occur? "

VoiceInWilderness wrote on May 14, 2008 9:42 AM:

" My wife and I pulled off hiwy 9 near Arrowsmith yesterday in three areas where we'd be closer to the turbines than when driving through towns with grain elevators. That, to check the noise in winds we considered "average" to "high." The blades were turning at about the same rate as we've seen many times as we passed going to Bloomington. We turned off our engine at three nearest the road. We could barely hear the wind across the blades of the turbine. In other words, the turbines are quieter than the wind and certainly much quieter than an operating grain elevator, trucks on the roads, combines in the fields and other noises we've adjusted to. Quieter than our refrigerators. Quieter than the winds through trees in towns and hedgerows in townships. Do grain elevators lower the value of homes? Do road noises? Does planting and harvesting near small towns and in townships lower the value of homesites? We don't want to see turbines blamed for the incompetence of decision makers and the ol' boy networks, do we? "

Add your own comments

Please read the rules before posting comments.

You must be logged in to leave comments.
If you don't have a member ID, please register.

*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
  Forgot Your Password?