Pantagraph.com Weather forecast, local radar and more
NewsSaturday, June 14, 2008 11:13 PM CDT
Market Street closed after more wood falls from bridge
Advertisement

BLOOMINGTON -- A west side thoroughfare was closed around a railroad overpass after wood fell from the bridge Thursday night, police said.

Traffic barricades blocked Market Street into late Friday afternoon around the railroad bridge, which is between Morris and Western avenues. The street was previously closed when wood struck two cars May 31.

No cars or people were struck by the falling debris Thursday, said Bloomington Police spokesman Duane Moss. In the previously incident, nobody was directly struck but a woman complained of back pain after stopping her car quickly, police previously said.

Moss said someone reported seeing falling railroad ties or pieces of ties about 9:25 p.m. Thursday. Union Pacific, which owns the tracks, sent an inspector from Iowa and the city put up barricades, he said.

The street will remain closed until Union Pacific officials say it is safe, Moss said.

“I think they’d have some questions to answer about the bridge because it’s their bridge,” Moss said.

Union Pacific spokeswoman Zoe Richmond said the wood fell from an older walkway that was no longer needed by locomotive workers. Union Pacific workers tried to repair it enough to hold it in place after wood fell late last month, she said, but they removed the structure following Thursday’s problem.

“Those four-by-fours were falling from a walkway that is no longer in use,” Richmond said. “So the Bloomington Police Department were helping us barricade traffic while our crews removed the walkway so we won’t have this situation in the future.”

Richmond apologized for the inconvenience to drivers. She said that the walkway began falling apart because of basic wear and tear.

Richmond noted the company has 33,000 miles of track to maintain, “So it sometimes takes us a while until we’re doing maintenance on one location or the next.”

“But this one definitely got bumped up onto our priority list,” she said.

Video
Most commented stories
Browse online archives
Recent issues:
Reader comments on this story - 18 total

Note: All views and opinions expressed in reader comments are solely those of the individual submitting the comment, and not those of the Pantagraph or its staff.

The Peanut Gallery wrote on Jun 14, 2008 8:23 AM:

" It's Bush's fault! "

otis wrote on Jun 14, 2008 2:03 AM:

" the city would have money to fix the bridge if it hadnt wasted it all on pelo and the colisium besides its on the west side and 94%of state farmers leave east of main st. does anyone knows if pelo gets a rebate check or not "

Darknight wrote on Jun 14, 2008 12:20 AM:

" I'm at a lost here. What does the camel back bridge have to do will the R.R. I was sure that the train ran under that bridge and not over it. So therefore the R.R. didn't own it, and they didn't have to maintain it. What difference does it make which side of Bloomington the bridges are on? That bridge on Market st. is still in use by the R.R. and it should have been repaired. But if nobody complaines to the R.R. then the R.R. isn't going to know that it's tracks are falling apart. After all just how many trains go over them tracks a day or a week? As far as the bridges on the east side. They have been gone for 20 years, so whats there to complain about? "

MacMan86 wrote on Jun 13, 2008 8:42 PM:

" Last time I checked Main Street was the east west dividing line. Camel Back Bridge is on the East Side (Not to mention the Bridge at Vernon Ave. near Campus). As well as, Bloomington took out the IC Railway bridges on Washington, Emerson, and Oakland Ave. (All East Side Bridges) See what happens when you allow hell bent governments go get a hold of bridges that were just sitting there doing nothing and not making any noise or anything.
Happy Weekend! "

Waffle of Justice wrote on Jun 13, 2008 7:58 PM:

" FTA:...removed the structure following Thursday’s problem. Regarding the walkway... How is that going to affect the overall structural integrity of the bridge. Generally when you take away part of the entire design you weaken the structure. Just put a big net there to catch the falling wood... problem fixed. "

Danser61701 wrote on Jun 13, 2008 5:38 PM:

" To Booklover and Zeva, I think Bizzyboddy was joking around. It IS Friday! "

BookLover wrote on Jun 13, 2008 3:48 PM:

" to bizzyboddy;

There are no bridges on the east side. And the bridge isn't falling into disrepair because of east/west side rivalries. That particular bridge is maintained by the railroad companies; Blo-No aint allowed to touch it. "

blogger wrote on Jun 13, 2008 3:28 PM:

" Everytime I went by there today there were the same city guys in their trucks haning out by the closing. perhpas you could put one of them to work on the bridge or maybe their time would be better suited on another project? I bet that cost us about 1k today to sit and watch the bridge. What's the point of that? To watch falling ties? And does it really take 4-guys to do that? "

jipsi wrote on Jun 13, 2008 2:43 PM:

" I'm actually intrigued... as a bona-fide spinal injury victim (broadsided, my door, by a car running a stop at 40+mph, causing multiple hairline fissures, both lumbar and cervical vertebrae damage, with the grand topper of spinal cord compression), I may not be an expert but... wouldn't braking to a stop bring the body (and spine) FORWARD?
Most serious injuries to the back/spine happen when it is manipulated into an unnatural state, as in snapping backward (ie: rear-end impact) or twisting sideways (ie: broadside impact). It's my understanding that the spine is pretty resilient when it comes to FORWARD manipulation...
I may be wrong, but I will say this: in my 8+ years' experience, I've encountered many other "back injury" victims. Many were quite clearly injured, some, like myself, for the permanent run.
Some literally "danced" from the parking lot to the doc's waiting room... (uh-huh)

I wish *I* was one of the "dancers"... ;-(

I'm just curious as to how being thrown "forward" (without hitting the steering wheel or windshield) would cause any kind of back or spinal injury...anyone? "

chickenman wrote on Jun 13, 2008 2:39 PM:

" Atleast the city won't have to worry about it's exposure to RIMCO. Although they probably would deny it anyway. "

Zeva wrote on Jun 13, 2008 2:38 PM:

" Help me out folks, where is their a bridge on the east side? As far as I know their is none. So how did "bizzybody" come to this conclusion? This railroad tressel DOES NOT belong to the city, so what would the east side have to do with it? This is the property of the railroad and they have no interest in if it's on the north, east, south or the west. So sides of town have nothing to do with it. "

garden lady wrote on Jun 13, 2008 2:22 PM:

" Looks like Unoin Pacific RR used all their funds tearing down the the old telegraph poles on Route66. The Hawks used to perch on them. I don't see near as many Hawks now. They also went crazy spraying defoliant along the tracks.
They should have used the $$ to keep briges from falling in. "

Bizzyboddy wrote on Jun 13, 2008 2:20 PM:

" This never happens to bridges on the east side "

dontbelieveit wrote on Jun 13, 2008 12:59 PM:

" To bad it wasn't me...I could have used a new car and faked a back injury "

pseudo-intellectual wrote on Jun 13, 2008 12:44 PM:

" That's an important artery- you don't have to be a rocket scientist to figure out an alternative route, but it is an inconvenience. I must have missed the part of the story about the woman who injured her back stopping the car in the previous incident. That's a freak injury at best. Watch out, City of Bloomington and Union Pacific- Some folks are always looking to win the lottery... "

mds1 wrote on Jun 13, 2008 10:36 AM:

" I hope the city of Bloomington is putting all possible pressure on the railroad to fix this bridge properly, and soon. Are they waiting for someone to get killed before it is fixed correctly? A Mickey Mouse job of repairs obviously isn't going to cut it. Maybe city officials need to get our U.S. Representatives involved in getting this taken care of once and for all. Something needs to be done permanently, not just a temporary fix. "

Pastafarian wrote on Jun 13, 2008 10:30 AM:

" While they're at it, just tear it up and build a new one. The road in that area is in dire need of repair. "

lindini wrote on Jun 13, 2008 9:57 AM:

" It's funny, I was just driving under that bridge a few days ago and looked up and though, this thing just looks worse than ever and that someone is going to get hurt soon. I'm sad to see my thought was so on target... "

Add your own comments

Please read the rules before posting comments.

You must be logged in to leave comments.
If you don't have a member ID, please register.

*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
  Forgot Your Password?