Ads by Yahoo!

" A simple purchase of symbol UNG at current levels would be a hedge against possible rising natural gas prices. "

" The fundamental reason that natural gas prices have risen so high is that in the last 20 years we have built about 90% of our new electrical generator capacity fueled by Natural gas.

As the natural law of Supply and Demand kick in, the cost of natural gas goes up and we pay more for heating our homes and water, and incidentally, have driven many chemical companies out of business.

We need to build more nuclear power plants and more wind and solar and get out of the habit of firing up natural gas plants to provide our peak power. "

" Clean Coal???? Do these guys actually believe this? They need all the natural gas they can for the wasteful production of ethanol and fertilizer for the corn they grow. We all pay the cost in the subsidies to welfare farmers. So there is no .60 savings. More lies from special interests blind to the truth. "

" Scott , Dennis ,How do you feel about ending the taxpayer subsides and tarrifs on trade for ethonal and biodiesel ? Why should us working folks line the pockets of farmers while food prices go higher and higher? These fuels cost way more than the price on the pump . Be honest you folks just want the profits from these fuel and the government welfair for producing them . Farmers have traditionly been self reliant yet more and more they sit back on the public dole like bums. "

" I think our energy costs should be the primary thing that is addressed this political season. So far we had Obama consulting with economic leaders to come up with a plan which he has done. Meanwhile McCain chose to respond by playing a Paris/Brittany ad and passing out tire gauges to ridicule until he realized there was something to that notion. We also have Graham who was McCain's cochair at the time saying we were in a mental recession and were a nation of whiners. McCain thinks our situation is a joke. And maybe Obama is right. McCain may care but he just doesn't know what is going on. Many people would rather pass on scurrilous emails rather than face up to the situation we have and how the candidates will use their judgment to address it. Are we going to choose someone willing to tackle the issue or someone who thinks it is a big joke? Are we going to choose someone who would rather use gimmicks than plans? And admits it. "