13th Congressional District: Ten months ago, no one thought Rodney Davis and David Gill would be facing each other for Illinois’ new 13th Congressional District seat. However unlikely the match-up is, we think Republican Davis is best-suited to represent Central Illinois.

The Nov. 6 winner replaces GOP U.S. Rep. Tim Johnson, who withdrew from the race after the primary, leaving GOP county chairmen to pick Davis in mid-May. Gill won a tough primary race against Greene County State’s Attorney Matt Goetten by 163 votes.

The biggest disappointment in the Gill/Davis race has been its negative, often nasty tone, punctuated by sharp exchanges via mailers and broadcast advertising. Outside groups have spent $4.6 million trying to sway voters — and that doesn’t include what the candidates have spent.

Davis has staked out some sensible positions. He says businesses need certainty, which he contends is hampered by the Affordable Care Act and Congress’ inaction about continuing the Bush-era tax cuts. Davis supports extending the current rates permanently and also wants to see an established transportation plan that, with federal funding, would put more people to work and reduce the nation’s still-too-high unemployment rate.

Gill has failed three times to win in the former 15th District, which should serve as a signal that perhaps his message isn’t something most Central Illinoisans embrace. Independent John Hartman has offered some interesting campaign moments, but is unelectable.

In recommending Davis, we plan to hold him to his word about being bipartisan and working for effective solutions. He must govern differently than the way he’s run his campaign.

18th Congressional District

Republican U.S. Rep. Aaron Schock doesn’t hesitate about the concerns of voters in the 18th Congressional District: agriculture, manufacturing jobs and the economy.

He understands the importance of passing an effective Farm Bill, helping to create decent jobs and growing the economy that he says is hampered by too much federal regulation, a burdensome corporate tax rate and a mountain of debt that can be addressed by comprehensive tax reform.

His Democratic opponent, Steve Waterworth of Easton, is concerned about the economy, too. He focuses a lot on foreign competition, particularly the threat from China, and the federal debt that he says must be addressed before spending is cut or taxes are raised — reducing imports of foreign-made goods and raising the import tax would help.

Schock supports extending the Bush tax cuts and opposes President Obama’s plan to raise taxes on the wealthy. Waterworth doesn’t necessarily think the wealthy should be taxed more because as they spend, they create jobs.

On health care, Schock targets key points in the debate, including addressing the issue of pre-existing conditions, giving consumers “more control of their dollar” and allowing cross-state competition.

Waterworth, a U.S. Air Force retiree, supports the Affordable Care Act, and says time will tell what works and what doesn’t, and that the law will create jobs in the long run.

There are myriad other issues that deserve study and attention — too many to fully address here.

But we feel Schock has a firm grasp on most of them and has demonstrated sound reasoning and a willingness to buck the standard GOP response to anything supported by Democrats. He deserves another term in Congress.

More from pantagraph.com

(5) comments

Grandpa Sam

There you go again! Vote in an Obstructionist that was appointed by a group of do-gooders! Please, let's get an expert in there! Dr.Gill can quickly tweak the health reform needed to hasten widespread implementation, which is mr. Davis's affliction. Mr.Davis wants throw-it-out Mitt to dump Medicare,Social Security, and national health insurance...

john doe

yes they may spend more to create jobs if they don't raise their taxes. Just like Target and Walmart.The people at these places just love these jobs they get minamin wage and 7 cents more after one year working @ Target like my partner recieved. Each store at Target has a goal to make each dayto make.If they are to make 200 thousand that day and make 180 thousand they lose money. When they lose money that month they cut every body houres back. So go ahead don't tax them more so the poor can get poorer and the rich can get richer.


Why does this editorial endorsing Davis and Schock have the same wording as the editorial appearing in the Decatur Herald-Review, which also happens to endorse the same candidates? Did one person write both pieces and then slightly tweak the title to make them not quite as obviously identical? Seriously, even the lead-in about "Ten months ago" is basically the same.


The Pantagraph is making safe bet endorsements in hopes of breaking the long standing Pantagraph curse of endorsing candidates that end up losing in the election !


Gill is by far the better candidate. Don't follow the Pantagraph endorsement.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.