Skip to main content
You have permission to edit this article.
Rutherford: Legal challenge 'inevitable' for pension law

Rutherford: Legal challenge 'inevitable' for pension law

  • 2

SPRINGFIELD — State Treasurer Dan Rutherford said Thursday he has not done the math when it comes to figuring out how the state’s newly enacted pension changes will affect his own retirement check.

On the same day Gov. Pat Quinn quietly signed the landmark pension changes into law, the 58-year-old treasurer hosted a conference call with reporters to again say he opposes the legislation.

Rutherford, who is running for governor, said he believes the changes, which were enacted to help erase a $100 billion shortfall in the pension systems, won’t survive a legal challenge because the state constitution bars lawmakers from diminishing pension benefits.

“I am not a litigious kind of guy, but this one is inevitable,” he said. “I hope that we have an expeditious resolution to it.”

The Republican from Chenoa said he has not taken the time to calculate the effects of the landmark legislation on his own pocketbook.

“I’ve been busy looking at the constitutionality of it,” Rutherford said.

But, according to a database created by the Center for Tax and Budget Accountability, Rutherford could see a significant loss in buying power if the pension proposal goes into effect next year.

If he were to retire next year, Rutherford would receive a pension worth about $115,000, based on his current $135,600 salary. While that amount will grow on a yearly basis, the database shows the pension changes would decrease the amount of growth by $44,800 in the first five years.

After 15 years, the database shows Rutherford would see $392,000 less than he would under the current pension setup. Two decades from now the projected loss would be $719,000.

The online database — — is designed to show current state employees and retirees how a reduction in the state’s current 3 percent cost-of-living adjustment would affect worker pensions over a period of years.

Under the plan, the COLAs would be based on only the first $30,000 of pension income.

The measure, which was narrowly approved by the General Assembly on Tuesday, also will raise the retirement age on a sliding scale for current workers under the age of 46. It also would give workers an option of joining a 401(k)-style retirement savings plan.

Rutherford is not alone in the GOP gubernatorial field when it comes to opposing the plan. State Sen. Kirk Dillard of Hinsdale voted “no.” Wealthy businessman Bruce Rauner of Winnetka also urged lawmakers to vote against the plan.

State Sen. Bill Brady of Bloomington voted in favor of the new law.

The legislation is Senate Bill 1.


Be the first to know

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

Related to this story

Get up-to-the-minute news sent straight to your device.


News Alerts

Breaking News