Commentary: Congress should let the airlines go to bankruptcy court
AP

Commentary: Congress should let the airlines go to bankruptcy court

  • 0
{{featured_button_text}}
An airport worker stands in a nearly empty TSA Pre queue on Saturday, March 14, 2020 at Terminal 7 of Los Angeles International Airport in Los Angeles, Calif. LAX Ambassador Nahid Naiem said crowds of travelers were down about 40 percent.

An airport worker stands in a nearly empty TSA Pre queue on Saturday, March 14, 2020 at Terminal 7 of Los Angeles International Airport in Los Angeles, Calif. LAX Ambassador Nahid Naiem said crowds of travelers were down about 40 percent. (Brian van der Brug/Los Angeles Times/TNS)

Did you take a flight on United Airlines between December 2002 and February 2006? How about on Delta between September 2005 and April 2007? Or on American Airlines between November 2011 and December 2013?

If so, you traveled on a bankrupt airline. These firms had all invoked Chapter 11 of the U.S. bankruptcy code and were in the process of restructuring their finances in court. Yet they continued to operate and still exist today.

However, Washington seems to believe that airlines need to be saved from this process. The Senate coronavirus emergency aid bill, headed to the House for consideration on Friday, contains up to $25 billion in loans and loan guarantees to the airline business, plus $25 billion in direct funding for airline employee salaries and benefits, plus $3 billion to keep paying the contract workers who provide airline catering and services at the airport. That's a lot of taxpayer money.

There is no reason that the federal government should spend upward of $50 billion to bail out airlines when these companies continue to have access to the same financial restructuring procedures that they have used time and time again.

When there is fundamental ongoing demand for the service or product a company provides, and there is a sustainable business model that underlies it, Chapter 11 bankruptcy allows the company to restructure its debts. Shareholders are wiped out and creditors such as banks and bondholders take losses as well. But these investors should take losses in such a scenario. After all, they took the risk of investing in the hopes of earning a higher return. There was no guarantee that such investments would perform well.

On the other hand, when a company's business is simply no longer viable, it will likely end up being dismantled and liquidated. In a liquidation, the assets are sold off and the proceeds are used to pay off some of the company's debts. For example, Toys "R" Us began with a Chapter 11 filing in 2017 but ultimately ended up being liquidated the following year. The store chain's troubles weren't just a one-time shock. Its business model was simply no longer sustainable in the world of Walmart and Amazon.

There is only one real risk of sending airlines and other affected businesses into Chapter 11 bankruptcy, and that is the risk that a business with value as a going concern might end up being liquidated anyway. For a firm to pursue Chapter 11, its creditors must get enough additional loans to be able to continue to operate the firm during the bankruptcy. This new credit is called debtor-in-possession, or DIP, financing.

If capital markets are severely disrupted, such financing might not be available, or might be available only on prohibitive terms. That might tilt the process toward inefficient liquidations. If such capital market disruption is a major concern, the government could support this market for bankruptcy finance by offering some short-term DIP financing, in conjunction with private creditors who would add discipline to the deal.

Airline executives are well aware that they run business with large fixed costs on very thin margins. Since creditors are confident in their ability to recover substantial portions of their debt investments, particularly those secured on aircraft and other tangible assets, they are willing to provide airlines with a very large amount of credit.

When Congress speaks of helping airlines, it is really talking about helping investors in these airlines: creditors and shareholders. Perhaps also frequent flyers who might see the value of their air miles diluted, but that is certainly a cost society can bear.

So while there may be some reasons for limited federal support to ensure efficient bankruptcy outcomes, there is every reason to believe capital markets and courts would work again, as they have in the past. Nobody really thinks that without government assistance the entire business of offering flights to individual travelers is going to collapse, forcing consumers to drive or ride Amtrak. And if Congress truly wants to help workers, why are lawmakers selecting airline workers in particular? Most of the millions of workers now claiming unemployment insurance are not in the airline industry.

This general line of reasoning applies not only to airlines but to all other industries dominated by large corporations. Investors should bear the losses they signed up to take when they invested. Taxpayers should be protected from restoring those losses under the false pretense of saving the business. And to the extent there is any government involvement in large corporations that are highly indebted by their own choice, it should focus on ensuring that the Chapter 11 restructuring process has the financing it needs to proceed without ending in unnecessary liquidation.

___

ABOUT THE WRITER

Joshua D. Rauh is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution and Ormond Family Professor of Finance at the Stanford Graduate School of Business.

Visit the Chicago Tribune at www.chicagotribune.com

0
0
0
0
0

Catch the latest in Opinion

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

Related to this story

Most Popular

  • Updated

Even as the number of confirmed cases of COVID-19 in the United States keeps rising sharply, President Donald Trump continues to express confidence. He has gone from optimism in the face of the imminent threat of the coronavirus to suggesting that the pandemic will abate soon and the U.S. economy will be "raring to go" by Easter. Trump's optimism stands in sharp contrast to the recommendations ...

  • Updated

Nikki Haley took to Twitter on Thursday to complain about a few items in the $2 trillion stimulus bill that the Senate passed Wednesday and the House passed Friday. She could have objected to the White House's reluctance to spend $1 billion on life-saving ventilators, but that would have put her in President Donald Trump's Twitter crosshairs. She commendably stepped down from the board of ...

Suppose Joe Biden is elected president in November, but the Senate stays Republican. Or, suppose he loses, but the Democrats manage to take the Senate anyway. If Americans vote the way they have in recent elections, both those eventualities are unlikely. As the rift between the two parties, and that between their supporters, has grown to Grand Canyon dimensions, Americans have largely ...

The coronavirus outbreak is becoming a new ideological litmus test, but not the one we all thought it was going to be. Sure, there's the usual split between the Trumpian right, which has insisted throughout that the problem is under control, and the Pelosian left, which has been writing your grandmother's obituary since late February. That's reinforced by the greater prevalence of the virus in ...

Until the past week or so, I've rarely thought of myself as old, at least not in the diminishing way the word is often used. I work a full-time job, walk 5 miles a day, go to the gym, teach yoga to young theater students and climb three flights of stairs to my condo several times a day. I never kid myself that age is only in the mind - the mirror won't allow that delusion - but I don't feel ...

Get up-to-the-minute news sent straight to your device.

Topics

News Alerts

Breaking News